| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 SO 485/19 ER | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 1/20 B ER | 26.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 923/19 | 25.09.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 642/19 | 13.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 962/16 | 19.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 8/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 43 AS 3703/16 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 25. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 (30) R 77/09 | 09.05.2012 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 732/12 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 9/20 ER | 03.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 92/20 B ER | 28.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 KN 248/01 U | 22.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 25. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 14 AL 1652/98 | 07.12.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 78/00 | 09.08.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 7 KR 438/18 | 11.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 282/19 | 23.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 SO 9/20 ER | 03.04.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 92/20 B ER | 28.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AS 1280/13 | 11.04.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 447/17 | 16.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 R 1004/16 | 20.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 705/17 | 08.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 6/19 R | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 R 784/16 | 12.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 863/16 | 20.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 7/19 R | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 27 BK 11/16 | 13.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 BK 12/17 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 KG 1/19 R | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 47 R 340/15 | 06.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 5/18 | 25.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 21/19 R | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 18 VE 25/13 | 25.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 40/16 | 29.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/18 R | 12.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 KR 537/17 | 30.01.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 94/18 | 15.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 7/19 R | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 4 U 36/15 | 13.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 U 114/16 | 19.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/18 R | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 KR 38/17 | 24.10.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 705/17 | 05.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 8/19 R | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 1124/14, 1125/14 u. 1126/14 | 10.03.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 85/15 | 08.02.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 67/17 R | 03.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 25. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 AS 812/20 ER | 25.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AS 1070/20 ER-B | 08.05.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 AY 5235/19 ER | 20.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 22. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 88 SO 2516/13 | 28.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 236/16 | 20.07.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 14/18 R | 05.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 17 AS 2479/16 | 05.04.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AS 615/17 | 25.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 10 KR 39/14 | 13.03.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 220/14 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Mai 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 412 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 412 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 412 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 485/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-485-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-485-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 642/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-642-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-642-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 8/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-8-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-8-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 AS 3703/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-as-3703-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-as-3703-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 (30) R 77/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-30-r-77-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-30-r-77-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SO 9/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-so-9-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-so-9-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KN 248/01 U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-kn-248-01-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-kn-248-01-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 1652/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-1652-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-1652-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 438/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-438-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-438-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 92/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-92-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-92-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 447/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-447-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-447-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 6/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-6-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:00:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:00:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-6-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 7/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-7-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-7-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 KG 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-kg-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-kg-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 21/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-21-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-21-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87371 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 7/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-7-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-7-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 7/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-7-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-7-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 8/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-8-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-8-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 67/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-67-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-67-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1070/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1070-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1070-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AY 5235/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ay-5235-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ay-5235-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 123936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 236/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-236-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:58:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:58:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-236-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 615/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-615-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:20:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:20:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-615-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 220/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-220-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:20:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:20:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-220-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134659 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 485/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-485-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-485-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => df0cad8c4c79ca297d8387b86e144497 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:93295349ca891ed27f96184dcccc8bfa:0.48733700 1758338534 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.