| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 4155/13 | 09.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 376/16 | 25.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 19/18 R | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 8. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 4155/13 | 09.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 376/16 | 07.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 19/18 R | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 8. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 2798/18 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 431/19 | 27.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 8. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 P 32/96 | 10.12.1997 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 P 25/98 | 20.01.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 AL 34/99 | 03.02.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 75/00 | 07.03.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 BL 13/11 | 26.10.2012 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 5/16 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 279/04 | 30.08.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 7 U 411/18 | 29.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 7. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 47 AS 213/19 | 06.02.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 7. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 5 SB 503/17 | 26.06.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 132/18 | 10.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 596/17 | 05.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 10/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 AS 620/18 | 25.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 417/19 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 SF 105/15 E | 07.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 48/17 E | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 33 AS 1352/16 | 24.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1122/18 | 30.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 18/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 21 KR 2381/13 | 10.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 46/17 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 10/19 R | 19.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 3622/12 | 11.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1055/15 | 23.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 13 KR 433/16 | 28.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 198/18 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 18/19 R | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 779/12 KL | 21.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 1/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 1 KR 620/14 | 03.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 100/15 | 28.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/18 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 KR 3944/14 | 14.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 206/18 | 11.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 2/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 3964/15 | 12.04.2018 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 16/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 175/17 | 22.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 593/17 | 26.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 31/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 45 AS 266/19 ER | 15.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 422/19 B ER RG | 05.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 6. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 275/13 | 07.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 6. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 102/20 ER | 05.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 6. Mai 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 415 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 376/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-376-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-376-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 376/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-376-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:32:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:32:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-376-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143267 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 2798/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-2798-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-2798-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 P 32/96 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-p-32-96 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-p-32-96/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 34/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-34-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-34-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 5/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-5-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-5-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 279/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-279-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-279-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 411/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-411-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-411-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 AS 213/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-as-213-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-as-213-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 132/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-132-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-132-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 10/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-10-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-10-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 417/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-417-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-417-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 48/17 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-48-17-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-48-17-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125598 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1122/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1122-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:13:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:13:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1122-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 10/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-10-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-10-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 18/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-18-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-18-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 35/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-35-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-35-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 16/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-16-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-16-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 31/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-31-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-31-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 422/19 B ER RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-422-19-b-er-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-422-19-b-er-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 275/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-275-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-275-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 102/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-102-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-102-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 376/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-376-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-376-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 12e96dde6a881082cddf2695d7c120d4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:aba15385305e96d2e297afb254f7ca55:0.00318500 1758356731 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.