| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 RJ 100/98 | 20.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 6. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 5 U 144/97 | 09.03.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 102/99 | 29.03.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 6. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 V 102/94 | 29.06.1996 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 V 1/97 | 17.02.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 5/00 R | 12.06.2001 | Sozialgericht Münster | 6. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 1361/10 | 29.09.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 146/17 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 645/16 | 14.06.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 435/17 | 09.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 5336/15 | 18.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3159/18 | 24.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 7 JVEG 5/19 E | 03.03.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 241/20 | 25.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 38 KR 3747/19 ER | 14.02.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 181/20 B ER | 20.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 38 KR 56/18 | 19.03.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 495/18 B | 09.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 6 KR 2115/17 | 17.06.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 1141/19 B | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 424/18 | 30.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1459/18 B | 13.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 143/14 | 10.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 332/17 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 296/19 B | 04.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 10 AL 30/17 | 25.07.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 73/18 | 15.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 61/19 B | 12.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 32 KG 5/11 | 11.11.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 KG 5/15 | 08.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 KG 1/18 R | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 KR 5282/14 | 07.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3890/17 | 24.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 12 KR 1586/16 | 21.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1652/18 | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 KR 1433/16 | 04.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2701/17 | 14.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 P 707/17 | 12.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 993/19 | 13.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 5 U 24/17 (SG Kiel) | 26.11.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 1/19 | 18.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 16/20 B | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 36 U 104/16 (SG Itzehoe) | 30.06.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 53/16 | 19.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 1159/20 ER | 30.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 4. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 RA 145/02 | 29.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 B 66/04 KR | 11.10.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 6 U 141/19 BW | 19.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 U 153/19 B BW | 21.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 58/17 | 21.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 614/19 NZB | 25.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 998/16 | 23.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 471/19 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. Mai 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 416 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 416 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 416 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 100/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-100-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-100-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 144/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-144-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-144-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 V 102/94 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-v-102-94 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-v-102-94/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130141 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 146/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-146-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-146-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 435/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-435-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-435-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3159/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3159-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3159-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 241/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-241-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-241-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 181/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-181-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-181-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 495/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-495-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-495-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 1141/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-1141-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-1141-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1459/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1459-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1459-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 332/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-332-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-332-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 73/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-73-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-73-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 KG 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-kg-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-kg-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3890/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3890-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3890-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1652/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1652-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1652-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2701/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2701-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2701-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 993/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-993-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:06:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:06:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-993-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 1/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-1-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-1-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 53/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-53-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-53-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 AS 1159/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-as-1159-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-as-1159-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 RA 145/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ra-145-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ra-145-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 153/19 B BW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-153-19-b-bw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-153-19-b-bw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 58/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-58-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-58-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 998/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-998-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-998-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 RJ 100/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-rj-100-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-rj-100-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9e1f17b840f4f9eaa670b171fbe322b4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5b489772de1edc7e6f6b28a58bdb3f3c:0.18494600 1758338505 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.