| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 3 U 96/14 | 22.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 108/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 212/19 B | 30.03.2020 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 4. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 AY 22/19 ER | 30.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 4/20 B ER | 31.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 161/17 | 25.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 4. Mai 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 AY 6/19 ER | 05.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 14/19 B ER | 26.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 1 AS 58/17 | 21.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 614/19 NZB | 25.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 3 U 96/14 | 22.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 108/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 212/19 B | 30.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 14659/16 | 11.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 251/20 NZB WA | 02.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 304/15 | 23.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 132/16 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 514/15 KL | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 209 P 506/19 ER | 20.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 P 4/20 B ER | 24.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 5 SB 64/15 | 03.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 187/17 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 111 P 1706/14 | 27.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 P 40/16 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 1864/09 | 29.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 64/14 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 14/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Mai 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 17 KR 558/15 | 25.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 115/18 | 24.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 33/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. April 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 33 U 162/13 | 01.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 123/16 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 6/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. April 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 14 AS 1909/17 | 15.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 610/19 NZB | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. April 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 KR 476/15 | 23.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 51/19 B | 25.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. April 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 89/99 | 31.01.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. April 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 58 AS 278/20 ER | 09.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 170/20 B ER | 20.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 | |
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 630/17 KL | 15.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 2/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AS 4750/14 | 24.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 2540/16 | 13.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 2/19 R | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 15 KR 477/13 | 12.04.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 212/16 | 28.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/19 R | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 10/11 | 09.04.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 224/14 | 27.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 15/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 4364/17 KL | 05.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 2/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. April 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 44/12 | 30.01.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 22/15 | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/20 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. April 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 417 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 417 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 417 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 96/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-96-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-96-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AY 22/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ay-22-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ay-22-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 161/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-161-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-161-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AY 6/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ay-6-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ay-6-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 614/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-614-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-614-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 108/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-108-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-108-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 251/20 NZB WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-251-20-nzb-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-251-20-nzb-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 132/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-132-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-132-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 514/15 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-514-15-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-514-15-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 P 4/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-p-4-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-p-4-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 187/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-187-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-187-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 P 40/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-p-40-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-p-40-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 64/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-64-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-64-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 115/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-115-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-115-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 123/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-123-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-123-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 610/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-610-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-610-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161500 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 51/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-51-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-51-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 89/99 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-89-99 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-89-99/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 170/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-170-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-170-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 2/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-2-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-2-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 14/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-14-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-14-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87308 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 15/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-15-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-15-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 2/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-2-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-2-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 22/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-22-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:20:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:20:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-22-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-05-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 96/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-96-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-96-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 44f5d8d47311e42c53bbe9bacee0a6a0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:db3ed5d21210a4996560f5bd47f8e35c:0.62280100 1758350919 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.