Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 SF 15/20 AB | 01.04.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 | |||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 SF 83/14 E | 25.04.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 124/14 E | 15.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 1938/14 | 23.10.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 127/17 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 12 U 6031/15 | 04.01.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 109/18 B PKH | 30.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 20 SO 51/17 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 297/19 B | 18.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 AS 299/19 WA | 27.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 22/20 B PKH | 15.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 33 AS 491/17 | 13.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1421/19 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 168 AS 34194/11 | 15.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 321/17 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 170 SB 566/14 | 06.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 257/17 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 3 R 679/13 | 23.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 408/17 | 09.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 16352/15 | 24.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 2802/16 | 18.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 218/19 EK AS | 26.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. April 2020 | |||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 62 KR 38/15 | 20.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 383/16 | 30.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 33/18 R | 19.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 |
Sozialgericht Hannover | S 65 KA 40/14 | 23.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 128/15 | 09.08.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 64/17 R | 03.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. April 2020 |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 SB 335/17 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SB 93/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 15 AS 6560/11 | 21.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 621/15 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 8 AS 2783/12 | 16.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 504/15 | 27.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 47 AS 3219/18 ER | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 365/19 B ER | 26.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 24 AS 3760/15 | 16.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 291/17 NZB | 16.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 4 AS 1511/12 | 02.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 15/16 | 15.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 AS 402/16 | 17.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 554/17 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 EG 12/14 | 21.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 EG 4/16 | 23.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 13 KR 182/04 ER | 15.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 23. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 13 U 74/02 | 28.05.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 195/03 | 19.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 23. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 AL 36/02 | 05.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 50/03 | 05.11.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 23. April 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 419 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 419 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 419 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SF 15/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sf-15-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sf-15-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 124/14 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-124-14-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-124-14-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 127/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-127-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-127-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 109/18 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-109-18-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-109-18-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 297/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-297-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-297-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 22/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-22-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-22-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1421/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1421-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1421-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 321/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-321-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:21:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:21:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-321-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 257/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-257-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-257-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 408/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-408-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-408-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 2802/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-2802-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-2802-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 218/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-218-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-218-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 33/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-33-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-33-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 64/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-64-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-64-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 93/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-93-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-93-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 621/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-621-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-621-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 504/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-504-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-504-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 365/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-365-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-365-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 291/17 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-291-17-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-291-17-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 15/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-15-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-15-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 554/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-554-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-554-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 4/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-4-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-4-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 182/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-182-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-182-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 U 74/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-u-74-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-u-74-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 36/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-36-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-36-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SF 15/20 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sf-15-20-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sf-15-20-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => fd795567b3516d8b0a23bc30bf4afa8a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d08d7ae394937893fe7bef9167b4cdbe:0.55206900 1758356768 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.