Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 373/20 ER | 26.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 20. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 330/18 | 29.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 143/20 ER | 17.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 20. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 KR 259/14 | 18.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 683/18 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 20. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 45/18 K | 23.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 20. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 330/18 | 29.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 143/20 ER | 17.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 KR 259/14 | 18.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 683/18 | 30.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 20. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 195 SO 2948/13 | 09.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 245/16 | 13.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 3/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. April 2020 |
Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5087/19 | 05.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 129/20 ER | 04.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1533/18 | 23.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 2433/18 | 30.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 706/19 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3586/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 4108/18 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3937/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 AS 1464/18 | 21.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 16. April 2020 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 391/16 | 05.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 460/18 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 AS 483/19 WA | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1863/19 B | 29.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 228/16 | 03.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 54/17 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 417/14 | 02.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 4/17 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 788/17 | 29.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 420/17 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 966/15 | 24.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 311/16 | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 KR 312/12 | 14.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 216/16 | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 1624/12 | 14.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 19/17 | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 154 AS 5142/19 | 28.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2026/19 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 30 R 3366/18 | 28.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 670/19 | 26.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 65/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 141 R 978/17 | 21.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 476/19 | 04.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. April 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 421 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 421 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 421 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 373/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-373-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-373-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 330/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-330-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-330-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 259/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-259-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-259-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 45/18 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-45-18-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-45-18-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 143/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-143-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-143-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 683/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-683-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-683-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 245/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-245-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-245-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5087/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5087-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5087-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143131 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 129/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-129-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-129-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 1533/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-1533-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-1533-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 2433/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-2433-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-2433-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 706/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-706-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-706-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 4108/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-4108-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-4108-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 1464/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-1464-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-1464-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 460/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-460-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-460-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1863/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1863-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1863-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 54/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-54-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-54-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 4/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-4-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-4-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 420/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-420-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-420-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 311/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-311-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-311-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 216/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-216-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-216-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 19/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-19-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-19-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2026/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2026-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2026-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126361 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 670/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-670-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-670-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 476/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-476-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-476-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 373/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-373-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-373-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d2f99e5d1a67f90844fcc3ed2068d5ba [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:cc3156bd73e9df64beeee40f5cbb37c6:0.79639800 1758381108 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.