| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 SF 275/16 E | 03.08.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 271/16 E | 24.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. April 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 7 U 34/13 (SG Schleswig) | 27.01.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 32/16 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 2. April 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1763/19 | 23.03.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. April 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KR 249/16 | 22.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. April 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 21 R 381/13 (SG Lübeck) | 11.03.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 82/17 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 4/20 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 BA 4/19 | 10.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 31. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 146/19 | 18.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 402/19 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 9/19 | 18.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 404/19 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 31 KR 197/17 WA | 25.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 KR 812/17 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 30. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 295/05 | 19.09.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 27. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 5033/15 L | 14.01.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 60/16 | 25.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 KR 188/18 | 02.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 306/19 | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 1361/16 | 05.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 324/18 NZB | 06.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 AS 173/20 ER | 03.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 520/20 ER-B | 27.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 3 SO 552/17 | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 26. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 3 SO 616/16 ER | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 26. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 AS 155/19 ER | 10.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 605/19 B ER | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 17 KR 1064/18 ER | 24.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 67/19 B ER | 29.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 BK 6/15 | 15.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BK 12/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 BK 6/15 | 15.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BK 12/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 5 AS 82/05 | 29.10.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 288/17 | 10.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 98/19 BH, B 4 AS 16/20 BH | 15.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 AS 155/19 ER | 10.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 605/19 B ER | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1388/17 | 21.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 108/18 | 20.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 2168/19 ER | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 401/19 B ER | 26.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 2027/12 | 30.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 134/19 WA | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 424 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 424 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 424 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 271/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-271-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-271-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 32/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-32-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-32-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143119 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 1763/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-1763-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-1763-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 249/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-249-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-249-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 82/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-82-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-82-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137447 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 BA 4/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-ba-4-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-ba-4-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 402/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-402-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-402-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130187 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 404/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-404-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-404-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 KR 197/17 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-kr-197-17-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-kr-197-17-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 295/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-295-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-295-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 60/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-60-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-60-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 306/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-306-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-306-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 324/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-324-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-324-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 520/20 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-520-20-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-520-20-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 552/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-552-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-552-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 616/16 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-616-16-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:38:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:38:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-616-16-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 155/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-155-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-155-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 67/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-67-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-67-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BK 12/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-bk-12-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-bk-12-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BK 12/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-bk-12-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-bk-12-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 288/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-288-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-288-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 605/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-605-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-605-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 108/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-108-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-108-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126325 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 401/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-401-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-401-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 134/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-134-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-134-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-04-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 271/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-271-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-271-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e6e8d4a3d7311b095e891a00c2d1c997 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0fc371543e035de37c84eec7729c627c:0.76828800 1758413965 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.