| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 3 KR 177/14 | 19.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 110/17 | 11.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 126/17 KL | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 247/16 | 22.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 409/18 | 21.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 127/16 KL | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 1/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 301/17 | 08.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 92/18 | 17.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. März 2020 | |
| S 14 AS 3184/19 ER | 16.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 4073/19 ER-B | 06.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 U 3302/18 | 04.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 3673/19 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 AS 1424/18 | 30.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 4066/19 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 AL 1231/17 | 15.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 4432/18 | 12.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 2442/18 | 08.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1915/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1508/18 | 13.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 38 KR 2793/15 | 12.09.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 662/17 NZB | 24.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RS 573/17 | 04.09.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 646/19 ZV | 10.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 RS 1563/15 | 22.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 615/19 ZV | 12.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 33 RS 133/17 | 16.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 350/19 ZV | 09.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 19 AS 2464/19 ER | 02.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1435/19 B ER | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 35 AS 2690/19 ER | 27.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 82/20 B ER | 02.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 35 AS 2690/19 ER | 27.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 82/20 B ER | 02.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 15 U 72/16 | 13.12.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 13/18 | 04.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 704/13 | 16.07.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 197/15 | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 35/19 | 20.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 19. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 25 KR 434/13 | 07.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 51/17 | 12.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 22/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Rostock | S 16 KR 143/16 WA | 27.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | L 6 KR 29/17 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 3/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 KR 10/16 | 16.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 265/17 | 01.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/18 R | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 1 KA 4/16 | 25.01.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 12/17 | 17.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 5/18 R | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 425 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 425 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 425 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 110/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-110-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-110-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 126/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-126-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-126-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 409/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-409-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-409-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 127/16 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-127-16-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-127-16-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 92/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-92-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-92-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 4073/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-4073-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-4073-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 3673/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-3673-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-3673-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 4066/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-4066-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-4066-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153772 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 4432/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-4432-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-4432-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1915/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1915-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1915-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143105 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 1508/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-1508-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-1508-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 662/17 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-662-17-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-662-17-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 646/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-646-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-646-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 615/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-615-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-615-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 350/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-350-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-350-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1435/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1435-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1435-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 82/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-82-20-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-82-20-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 82/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-82-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-82-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 197/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-197-15-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-197-15-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 U 35/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-u-35-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-u-35-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 22/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-22-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-22-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 3/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-3-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-3-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 6/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-6-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-6-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 5/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-5-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-5-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 110/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-110-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:20:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:20:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-110-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 278a5ee165fb65d0b24213436ec75eb3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:14cf738903ae71e65e0a676782452488:0.05764400 1758392866 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.