| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 28 KR 704/16 | 24.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 130/17 | 07.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 4/18 R | 28.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 |
| - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 394/16 KL | 20.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 1/18 R | 28.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 19. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 19 AS 2057/17 ER | 13.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 18. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 14 R 2466/18 | 19.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 845/19 NZB | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 82/19 KL | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 3/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 213 AS 13225/15 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1726/19 | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 4783/15 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 31/17 | 13.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 32 AS 1286/18 | 25.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1567/19 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 67/20 B | 18.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 112 KR 1703/14 | 16.12.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 52/15 | 13.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 83/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 112 KR 199/13 WA | 13.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 184/15 | 13.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 84/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 74/15 | 29.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 39/17 | 07.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 25/19 | 12.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 16 AS 13559/16 | 20.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 554/18 | 30.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 197/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 44 AS 2040/15 | 07.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 2727/15 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 209/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 153/14 | 18.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 16. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 395/15 | 28.06.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 466/17 | 06.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 16. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 6 AS 1114/17 | 24.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 16. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 15 AL 4019/14 | 08.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 190/18 | 18.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 AS 658/16 | 07.02.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 292/18 | 05.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 12. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 32 R 13/16 | 07.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 267/19 | 19.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 2/20 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 12. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 15 U 341/15 | 25.07.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 311/16 | 03.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 KR 25/16 | 05.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 639/17 | 27.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 5 AS 82/05 | 29.10.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 8/08 | 13.07.2011 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 98/19 BH und B 14 AS 16/20 BH | 15.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 12. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 R 520/17 | 04.09.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 761/17 | 03.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 18/18 R | 16.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 12. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 27 RA 86/01 | 26.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 RA 81/02 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 11. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 1450/16 | 14.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 11. März 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 426 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 426 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 426 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 A 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-a-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-a-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 2057/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-2057-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-2057-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 845/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-845-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-845-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 82/19 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-82-19-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-82-19-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1726/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1726-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1726-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 31/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-31-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-31-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1567/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1567-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1567-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 52/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-52-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-52-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126004 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 184/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-184-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-184-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 39/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-39-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:14:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:14:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-39-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 554/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-554-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:13:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:13:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-554-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 2727/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-2727-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:13:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:13:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-2727-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 153/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-153-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-153-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 395/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-395-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-395-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AS 1114/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-as-1114-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-as-1114-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 190/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-190-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-190-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 658/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-658-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-658-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 R 13/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-r-13-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-r-13-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 311/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-311-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-311-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 639/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-639-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-639-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 8/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-8-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-8-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 18/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-18-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-18-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 RA 86/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-ra-86-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-ra-86-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 1450/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-1450-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-1450-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 4/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-4-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-4-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1684f42d74a5ca6c6da8f115f7883901 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:099dcfd41c774167b744a552b7d05d46:0.31038600 1758413980 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.