| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 SO 22/09 | 27.11.2009 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 SO 3/10 | 17.04.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 28/13 B | 03.09.2013 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 2. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 237/18 | 04.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. März 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 35 KR 2616/18 ER | 28.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 105/19 B ER | 09.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 535/15 | 15.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 122/18 | 30.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 340/18 B | 18.12.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 26 AS 1045/07 | 14.07.2008 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 B 242/08 AS | 29.09.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 2. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 AL 23/98 | 22.03.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 101/00 | 30.11.2000 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 2. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 35 KR 2616/18 ER | 28.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 105/19 B ER | 09.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. März 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 535/15 | 15.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 122/18 | 30.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 340/18 B | 18.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. März 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 2682/15 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 4197/17 | 15.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. März 2020 | |
| S 9 SF 15/17 E | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 533/17 B | 12.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 SV 1652/18 | 24.01.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 307/19 B | 08.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 4 AL 128/02 | 25.08.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 218/05 | 30.01.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 EG 5/15 | 28.01.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 4/16 | 22.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 53 SO 568/14 | 15.03.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 163/17 | 06.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 3754/19 ER | 16.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 36/20 B ER | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 EG 5/15 | 28.01.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 4/16 | 22.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 22 SO 174/14 | 20.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 234/16 | 27.04.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 8/17 R | 29.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 2 KA 126/17 | 21.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KA 24/18 | 04.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 14/19 B | 11.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 247/11 | 29.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 18/14 | 18.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/18 R | 26.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 653/17 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 44/19 | 24.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 33 P 88/16 | 07.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 P 1/19 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 2 KR 1285/15 | 24.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 62/18 | 19.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 8 KR 1332/15 | 23.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 43/18 | 19.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 1/20 R | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 27. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 45/19 | 11.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 65/19 | 11.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 430 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 430 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 430 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 22/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-22-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-22-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 237/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-237-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-237-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 KR 2616/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-kr-2616-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-kr-2616-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 535/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-535-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-535-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 1045/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-1045-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-1045-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AL 23/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-al-23-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-al-23-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 105/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-105-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-105-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 122/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-122-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-122-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4197/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4197-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4197-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 533/17 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-533-17-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-533-17-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150910 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 307/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-307-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-307-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AL 128/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-al-128-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-al-128-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 EG 5/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-eg-5-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-eg-5-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 163/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-163-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-163-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 36/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-36-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-36-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129966 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 4/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-4-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-4-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 8/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-8-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-8-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 14/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-14-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-14-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 44/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-44-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-44-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 1/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-1-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-1-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 62/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-62-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-62-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 43/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-43-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-43-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 45/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-45-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-45-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 65/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-65-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-65-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-03-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 22/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-22-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:39:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:39:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-22-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f377f8dca97a45e6026b428c7ea347a3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6ba88a798fbf756e807741ab34d03170:0.27489500 1758431270 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.