| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 536/19 | 23.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 27. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 1664/17 | 24.05.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 27. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 AS 788/06 ER | 15.12.2006 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 38/07 ER | 29.03.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 AS 3978/16 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 14 SO 108/07 ER | 05.11.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 121/07 ER | 16.01.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 13 U 5008/16 | 23.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 99/17 | 14.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 14 AS 318/14 | 30.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 196/17 | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 VG 14/15 | 11.03.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 26/16 | 03.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 31 R 1667/15 | 07.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 690/17 | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 BL 6/17 | 18.03.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 2/19 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 14 SB 112/15 | 16.06.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 18 SB 119/16 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 VG 43/17 | 25.10.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 VG 2/19 | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 2 R 351/14 | 17.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 213/16 | 22.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 141/19 B | 13.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 11 U 22/11 | 18.02.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 123/14 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 4 AS 395/17 | 13.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 677/18 NZB | 20.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 26 P 26/18 | 29.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 P 23/18 | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 13/19 B | 18.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 26. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 31 R 1667/15 | 07.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 866/17 | 09.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 1248/18 | 25.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 R 112/18 KN | 09.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 258/16 | 12.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 24 KR 1031/17 | 21.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 R 1415/15 | 08.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 26. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 SB 1110/14 | 23.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 SB 266/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 6 U 491/16 | 15.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 431 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 431 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 431 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 536/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-536-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-536-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 1664/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-1664-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-1664-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AS 788/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-as-788-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:05:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:05:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-as-788-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 AS 3978/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-as-3978-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-as-3978-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134497 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 SO 108/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-so-108-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-so-108-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 99/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-99-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-99-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 196/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-196-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-196-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 26/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-26-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-26-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 690/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-690-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-690-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 2/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-2-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-2-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130080 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 SB 119/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-sb-119-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-sb-119-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 2/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-2-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-2-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129964 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 213/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-213-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-213-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 123/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-123-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-123-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 677/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-677-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-677-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 23/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-23-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-23-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 1667/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-1667-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-1667-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 866/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-866-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-866-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 1248/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-1248-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-1248-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 112/18 KN [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-112-18-kn [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-112-18-kn/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140216 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 258/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-258-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-258-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KR 1031/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-kr-1031-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-kr-1031-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 1415/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-1415-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-1415-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SB 1110/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sb-1110-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sb-1110-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 491/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-491-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-491-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142967 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 R 536/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-r-536-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-r-536-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b68f168e735b5fd828108ab6b4565b60 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5fee099b796e3c08cef7cad2d622f04c:0.68967300 1758462762 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.