| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1011/18 | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 723/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 17 SO 303/19 ER | 01.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 9 KR 589/19 | 07.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1441/15 | 13.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 392/18 | 13.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 44 KR 379/17 | 14.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 460/16 | 05.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 25. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 643/18 | 06.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 185/19 B | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 22 EG 50/12 | 17.02.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 17/16 | 22.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 233/16 | 28.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 45/19 | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 233/16 | 28.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 45/19 | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 22 EG 50/12 | 17.02.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 17/16 | 22.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 643/18 | 06.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 185/19 B | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 6 AS 251/19 | 06.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 444/19 B | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 190/19 | 23.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 24. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 18 KR 195/14 | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 45/18 | 02.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 52 SO 35/13 | 28.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 63/16 | 09.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 51 R 1283/15 | 06.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 82/18 | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 243/15 | 15.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 26/18 | 04.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 218/17 WA | 23.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 9/18 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 137/18 | 30.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 3/19 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 46 KR 2067/15 | 25.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 130/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 KR 2024/16 | 15.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 15/19 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 21. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 SO 255/18 | 05.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 366/16 | 20.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 21. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 432 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 432 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 432 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1011/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1011-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1011-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 303/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-303-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-303-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 589/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-589-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-589-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1441/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1441-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1441-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 392/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-392-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-392-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 379/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-379-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-379-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 460/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-460-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-460-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AS 643/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-as-643-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-as-643-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 EG 50/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-eg-50-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-eg-50-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134492 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 233/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-233-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-233-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 45/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-45-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-45-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 EG 17/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-eg-17-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-eg-17-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 185/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-185-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-185-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 444/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-444-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-444-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 190/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-190-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-190-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 63/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-63-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-63-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 82/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-82-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-82-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 26/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-26-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-26-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 9/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-9-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-9-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 3/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-3-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-3-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 130/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-130-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-130-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 15/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-15-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-15-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 255/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-255-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-255-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 366/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-366-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-366-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1011/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1011-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1011-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 742900d218ebae753ec2479788b9ae83 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2eb4496cf646689569b1575af3b103cb:0.05415600 1758452267 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.