| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 AY 82/19 ER | 10.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 6 P 1/19 ER | 13.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 3 KR 433/11 | 07.03.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 18. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 14 AS 519/17 | 13.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 60/19 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 10 U 145/15 | 07.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 41/19 | 15.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| S 165 SF 235/17 E | 21.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 39 SF 91/17 B E | 17.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | ||
| S 7 U 87/04 | 29.06.2011 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 173/11 | 14.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 335/16 | 06.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 R 732/18 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 37 AS 627/19 ER | 08.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 1483/19 B | 13.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 5 SB 345/16 | 28.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 212/18 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 9 SB 351/15 | 23.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 178/18 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 192 SB 585/16 | 06.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 63/18 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 141 R 4243/13 | 27.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 906/16 | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 2/20 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 AS 1276/19 | 06.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2726/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 KR 1394/17 | 11.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3874/17 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 KR 780/16 | 17.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 4515/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 21 R 336/16 (SG Schleswig) | 29.06.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 134/18 | 16.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 27/18 | 31.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 AL 347/04 ER | 22.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 1 B 2/05 AL ER | 08.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 80/16 | 28.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 R 1065/16 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. Februar 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 4286/19 RG | 08.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 2419/18 | 24.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2698/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 12 KR 545/18 | 08.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3041/18 | 21.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 1805/16 | 16.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 653/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 15 KR 3727/16 | 14.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 241/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 434 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AY 82/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-ay-82-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-ay-82-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 P 1/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-p-1-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-p-1-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 433/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-433-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-433-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 60/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-60-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-60-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 41/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-41-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-41-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 39 SF 91/17 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-39-sf-91-17-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-39-sf-91-17-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 173/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-173-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-173-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 R 732/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-r-732-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-r-732-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 1483/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-1483-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-1483-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 212/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-212-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-212-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 178/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-178-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-178-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 63/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-63-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-63-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 906/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-906-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-906-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2726/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2726-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2726-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3874/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3874-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3874-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 4515/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-4515-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-4515-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 134/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-134-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-134-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137434 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 U 27/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-u-27-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-u-27-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AL 347/04 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-al-347-04-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-al-347-04-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 R 1065/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-r-1065-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-r-1065-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 4286/19 RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-4286-19-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:05:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:05:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-4286-19-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2698/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2698-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2698-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153699 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3041/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3041-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3041-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 653/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-653-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-653-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 241/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-241-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-241-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AY 82/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-ay-82-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-ay-82-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b56ef275bc7a6a89ba2c2545eb8d36c0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9ae5d6cc1dc419df4e3cb11635c98a38:0.97194600 1758462769 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.