| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 12 KR 2352/16 | 28.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 976/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 KR 1756/16 | 22.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 743/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KR 535/18 | 16.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3488/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 2421/15 | 04.09.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1215/17 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 787/16 | 18.06.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 949/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 3539/12 | 07.10.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1536/16 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 2035/17 | 12.11.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1523/18 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SB 359/19 | 27.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 14. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SB 2333/18 | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 14. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 42 AY 69/19 ER | 07.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 3/20 B ER | 06.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 AS 2108/15 | 26.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 834/16 | 21.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 42/18 R | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 8 R 766/16 | 12.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 BA 6/18 | 06.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 9/19 R | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 3 AL 90/14 (SG Schleswig) | 02.10.2014 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 5/18 | 22.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 AS 477/17 | 26.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 32 AL 396/17 | 11.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 11/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 32 AL 371/17 | 05.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 7 R 1865/15 | 13.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 38/17 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 13. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 44 AS 1057/16 | 23.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1331/17 | 11.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 49/18 R | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 5 AS 1078/16 | 24.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 744/17 | 06.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 43/18 R | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 131/13 | 01.02.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 35/16 | 19.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 13/18 R | 12.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 11 U 73/11 | 23.10.2014 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 266/14 | 28.10.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 25/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 31 KR 178/13 | 19.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 266/15 | 10.04.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 32/18 R | 28.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 R 263/19 ZV | 04.09.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 679/19 ZV | 05.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 R 423/18 ZV | 04.09.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 678/19 ZV | 04.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 R 215/18 ZV | 07.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 580/19 ZV | 03.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 435 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 435 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 435 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 976/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-976-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-976-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 743/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-743-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-743-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3488/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3488-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3488-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1215/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1215-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1215-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 949/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-949-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-949-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1536/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1536-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1536-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150902 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1523/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1523-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1523-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SB 359/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-sb-359-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-sb-359-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SB 2333/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-sb-2333-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-sb-2333-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 3/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-3-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-3-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 42/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-42-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-42-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87379 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 9/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-9-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-9-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-5-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:45:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:45:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-5-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 477/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-477-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-477-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AL 396/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-al-396-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:59:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:59:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-al-396-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 32 AL 371/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-32-al-371-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-32-al-371-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 R 1865/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-r-1865-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-r-1865-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 49/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-49-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-49-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 43/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-43-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-43-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87347 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 25/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-25-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-25-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 32/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-32-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-32-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 679/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-679-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-679-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 678/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-678-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-678-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 580/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-580-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:19:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:19:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-580-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 976/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-976-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-976-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b0d347b15d8af041e0df2412c19f70f5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ecdb665fb2781f746d2f48854290c7e9:0.98268100 1758474489 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.