| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 621/12 | 30.06.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 234/15 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 51 KR 2926/19 ER | 22.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 12. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 166/17 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KA 52/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 12. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 728/17 | 29.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 12. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 15 SB 260/18 | 08.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 SB 101/19 B | 31.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 12. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 113/18 | 14.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 16 SB 110/17 | 30.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 12. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 33 KR 881/11 (SG Lübeck) | 22.01.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 BA 25/19 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 42 SO 39/12 (SG Itzehoe) | 26.08.2015 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 8/16 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 37 AS 3080/19 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 11. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 RJ 130/03 | 15.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 11. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 53/19 | 03.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 154/19 B | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 AL 1390/04 | 05.11.2004 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 292/04 | 26.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 53/19 | 03.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 154/19 B | 29.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 114 AS 6387/16 | 19.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 567/19 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 39 AL 50/16 | 19.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 120/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 314/13 | 25.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 29/17 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KR 314/13 | 25.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 29/17 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 11/19 ER | 03.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 39/19 B ER | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 24 AS 1905/17 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 2103/19 NZB | 09.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 24 AS 1905/17 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 10 AS 2103/19 NZB | 09.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 114 AS 10012/19 ER | 03.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2223/19 B ER | 06.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 U 55/14 | 15.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 74/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 5 R 427/15 | 11.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 481/17 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 10 R 6842/14 | 25.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 173/16 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 436 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 436 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 436 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 234/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-234-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-234-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 KR 2926/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-kr-2926-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-kr-2926-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 166/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-166-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-166-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 728/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-728-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-728-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SB 101/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sb-101-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sb-101-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 113/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-113-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-113-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SB 110/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-sb-110-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-sb-110-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 25/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-25-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-25-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 8/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-8-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-8-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 3080/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-3080-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-3080-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 RJ 130/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-rj-130-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-rj-130-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138780 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 53/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-53-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-53-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138775 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 1390/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-1390-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-1390-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 154/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-154-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-154-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 567/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-567-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-567-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 120/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-120-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-120-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 29/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-29-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-29-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 29/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-29-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-29-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 39/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-39-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-39-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 2103/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-2103-19-nzb-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-2103-19-nzb-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AS 2103/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-as-2103-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-as-2103-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2223/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2223-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2223-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 74/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-74-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-74-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 481/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-481-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-481-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 173/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-173-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-173-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-12 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 234/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-234-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-234-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 124ac99defbb63732218a8fc14d053b3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ccbd3124c17d366335bd45457993ad5a:0.70923600 1758474497 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.