| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 99 AS 17645/15 | 31.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1312/17 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 27 AS 5043/15 | 22.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 1972/17 B PKH | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 216 AS 4444/17 WA | 28.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1435/19 | 14.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 26 SB 269/15 | 20.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 177/17 | 06.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 114 AS 1147/17 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 1752/19 NZB | 16.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1356/19 ER | 29.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 2213/19 B ER | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 84 AL 596/19 | 24.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 110/19 | 06.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 R 441/15 | 18.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 662/16 | 05.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 134 AS 1876/16 | 04.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 947/17 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 1754/18 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 845/19 | 29.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 4 U 53/14 | 28.04.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 207/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 1 AL 32/14 | 14.09.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 87/16 | 18.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 81/14 | 13.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 156/16 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 191/19 B | 12.11.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 SO 23/19 | 27.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 125/19 B | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 SO 23/19 | 27.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 125/19 B | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 486/09 | 18.03.2011 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 119/11 | 15.04.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 119/07 ER | 12.07.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 218/07 ER | 07.02.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 4 RA 537/03 | 25.07.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 326/07 | 18.04.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 263/17 ER | 10.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 338/17 | 09.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 15 KR 263/17 ER | 10.08.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 338/17 B ER | 09.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 81/14 | 13.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 156/16 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 191/19 B | 12.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 27 SO 23/19 | 27.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 125/19 B | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 112 KR 218/16 | 03.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 505/17 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 484/16 | 05.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 148/18 | 22.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 116/18 | 26.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 158/18 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 96/19 B | 20.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 437 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 437 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 437 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1312/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1312-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1312-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 1972/17 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-1972-17-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-1972-17-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1435/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1435-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1435-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126198 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 177/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-177-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-177-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1752/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1752-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1752-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 2213/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-2213-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-2213-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 110/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-110-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-110-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 662/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-662-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-662-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 947/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-947-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-947-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 1754/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-1754-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-1754-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 53/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-53-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-53-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 AL 32/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-al-32-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-al-32-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 81/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-81-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-81-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 23/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-23-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-23-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 SO 23/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-so-23-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-so-23-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 486/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-486-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-486-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 119/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-119-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-119-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 RA 537/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-ra-537-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-ra-537-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 263/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-263-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-263-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 338/17 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-338-17-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-338-17-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 156/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-156-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-156-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 125/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-125-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-125-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 505/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-505-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-505-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 148/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-148-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-148-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 158/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-158-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-158-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1312/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1312-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:19:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:19:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1312-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => aba2cb1d117cdd36a5b4855e82231207 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:328ad20d8e1f2d2dd7e7868a87e607de:0.08703500 1758480495 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.