| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 2 KA 33/13 | 26.01.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 21/15 | 08.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 7. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 1501/13 | 01.10.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 504/15 | 13.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/18 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 12 KR 250/12 | 26.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 400/14 | 26.01.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/18 R | 09.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 (13) AL 271/04 | 11.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 6. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 30 AL 44/06 | 13.02.2008 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 6. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 168/14 | 16.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 90/17 | 28.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 597/15 | 18.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 250/18 | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 6. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 23 SF 61/16 E | 17.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SO 102/18 B | 23.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 6. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 34 AS 695/19 ER | 22.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 528/19 B ER | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 6. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 10 VG 3/17 | 11.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 VG 5/19 B PKH | 28.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 924/14 | 31.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 293/16 | 13.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/18 R | 16.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 4207/15 | 08.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 416/16 | 29.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 1/19 R | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 1497/13 | 28.04.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 238/15 | 14.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 27/18 R | 09.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 45 KR 635/18 ER | 07.08.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 342/18 B ER | 06.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 47 KR 272/14 | 17.07.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 220/15 | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KA 112/12 | 25.11.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 3/16 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 26/19 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 (11) RJ 36/02 | 12.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 5. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 RA 133/03 | 04.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 5. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 9 RJ 200/00 | 05.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 5. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 564/15 | 05.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 472/17 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 17 R 4026/05 | 24.01.2008 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 162/08 | 17.12.2009 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 189/17 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 46/18 | 04.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 4. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 5 KR 280/18 | 26.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 175/19 B | 17.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 4. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 BA 41/19 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 4. Februar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 25 R 430/14 | 06.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 26/18 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 236/19 B | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 4. Februar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 438 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 438 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 438 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 33/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-33-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-33-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 3/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-3-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-3-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 (13) AL 271/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-13-al-271-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-13-al-271-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AL 44/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-al-44-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-al-44-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 168/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-168-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-168-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 597/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-597-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-597-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 SF 61/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-sf-61-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-sf-61-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134487 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 AS 695/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-as-695-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-as-695-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 VG 5/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-vg-5-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-vg-5-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 5/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-5-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-5-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 27/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-27-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-27-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 342/18 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-342-18-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-342-18-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 220/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-220-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-220-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 3/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-3-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-3-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 (11) RJ 36/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-11-rj-36-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-11-rj-36-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 RA 133/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-ra-133-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-ra-133-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 RJ 200/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-rj-200-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-rj-200-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 564/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-564-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-564-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 118319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 162/08 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-162-08 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 18:51:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 17:51:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-162-08/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 46/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-46-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:01:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:01:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-46-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 175/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-175-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-175-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 BA 41/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-ba-41-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-ba-41-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 430/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-430-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-430-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 33/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-33-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-33-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cf8e3eb568dadfcd96d169f081b8fd2c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0f823da5f19e4202820215bab6155976:0.96282800 1758480510 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.