| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 46 KR 2088/15 | 27.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 155/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 3. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 632/16 | 17.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 47/18 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 3. Februar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 8 KR 289/12 | 25.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 61/19 | 27.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 3 R 561/13 | 17.06.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 490/16 | 04.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 R 1184/14 | 11.08.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 729/16 | 25.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 1/16 | 01.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 422/17 | 08.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 63/19 B | 15.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2020 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 46/14 KL | 27.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 17/18 R | 11.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 981/19 | 10.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3637/19 | 23.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 AS 833/19 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 737/18 | 30.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 30. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 U 54/17 | 15.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 26/19 ER | 14.01.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 30. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 939/11 | 11.03.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 76/16 | 09.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/18 R | 14.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 39 KA 307/12 | 16.09.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 221/14 | 14.09.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 56/17 R | 13.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 AL 252/03 | 01.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 12 AS 2277/18 | 24.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 29. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AY 3/20 ER | 28.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 29. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 23 SF 61/16 E | 17.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SO 102/18 B | 23.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 597/15 | 18.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 250/18 | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 34 AS 695/19 ER | 22.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 528/19 B ER | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 564/15 | 05.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 472/17 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 1176/13 | 10.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 U 273/16 | 16.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 42 SO 188/19 ER | 10.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 42 SO 188/19 ER | 10.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 440 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 440 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 440 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 10975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 2088/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-2088-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-2088-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 632/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-632-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-632-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 61/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-61-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-61-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 490/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-490-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-490-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 729/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-729-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-729-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 422/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-422-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-422-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 46/14 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-46-14-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:07:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:07:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-46-14-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153671 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3637/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3637-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3637-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 833/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-833-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-833-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 737/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-737-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-737-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 54/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-54-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-54-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AY 26/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-ay-26-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-ay-26-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RS 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-rs-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-rs-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 56/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-56-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-56-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AL 252/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-al-252-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-al-252-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 2277/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-2277-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-2277-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133649 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 3/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-3-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-3-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 102/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-102-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-102-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 250/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-250-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-250-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 528/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-528-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-528-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 472/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-472-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-472-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 R 1176/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-r-1176-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-r-1176-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 U 273/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-u-273-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-u-273-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 SO 188/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-so-188-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-so-188-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144844 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 SO 188/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-so-188-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-so-188-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-02-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-02-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 2088/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-2088-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-2088-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9fe5798ad2d80fff62a41d219fce56c1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bc65588eacee3ef472487c857a479a28:0.84772500 1758485985 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.