| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 266/17 | 27.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 18 AS 2763/19 ER | 26.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 11 KR 1400/17 | 09.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 50 AS 2089/19 ER | 21.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 186 AS 24309/14 | 16.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 2127/18 | 25.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 157 AS 19617/15 | 30.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 25 AS 1831/18 | 24.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 10338/17 | 29.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 801/19 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 156 AS 34196/11 | 12.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 302/17 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 2171/16 | 26.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 442/17 | 06.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 2171/16 | 26.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 442/17 | 06.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 38/19 EK AS | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 18/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 38/17 KL | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/19 B | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 47 SO 439/17 | 04.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 208/17 | 25.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 9/19 B | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 19 R 3831/11 | 21.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 1037/16 | 01.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 85/18 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 2126/17 | 29.10.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1487/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 27. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 213/19 WA | 26.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 51 KR 3175/18 | 28.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 735/19 ER | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 AS 161/07 ER | 20.09.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KR 187/06 | 08.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 KR 169/05 | 25.04.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 AS 36/07 | 16.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1318/15 | 25.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Neuruppin | 27. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 U 3633/17 | 20.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 2610/18 | 16.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 97/07 | 29.03.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 24. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 441 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 441 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 441 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 266/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-266-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-266-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AS 2763/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-as-2763-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-as-2763-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 1400/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-1400-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-1400-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133744 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 50 AS 2089/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-50-as-2089-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-50-as-2089-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 2127/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-2127-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-2127-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 25 AS 1831/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-25-as-1831-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-25-as-1831-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 801/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-801-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-801-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 302/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-302-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-302-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 442/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-442-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-442-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 442/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-442-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-442-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126035 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 38/19 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-38-19-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-38-19-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 38/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-38-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:14:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:14:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-38-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125236 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 208/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-208-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:10:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:10:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-208-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1037/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1037-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:04:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:04:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1037-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1487/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1487-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1487-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KR 213/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-kr-213-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-kr-213-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 KR 3175/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-kr-3175-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-kr-3175-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134589 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 KR 735/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-kr-735-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-kr-735-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134586 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 161/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-161-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-161-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KR 187/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-kr-187-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-kr-187-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134577 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 169/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-169-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-169-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AS 36/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-as-36-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-as-36-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 1318/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-1318-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:14:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:14:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-1318-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 2610/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-2610-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-2610-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 97/07 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-97-07 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-97-07/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KA 266/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-ka-266-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-ka-266-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 04205cb9e1508021899ab600361679e6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:58e0a7342c600509ff43414e8168bf28:0.92708200 1758501681 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.