| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 2204/16 | 20.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 96/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 4713/15 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 36/17 | 13.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 76/15 | 06.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 9/18 | 29.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 143 KR 2168/15 | 10.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 338/17 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 263/14 KL | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1667/19 ER | 13.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 455/19 B ER | 08.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1301/19 ER | 16.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 381/19 B ER | 27.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 35 KR 499/14 | 09.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 584/16 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 35 AS 1059/12 | 27.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 481/17 | 17.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 915/15 | 10.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 343/18 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 32 AS 964/15 | 10.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 345/18 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 U 147/14 | 08.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 32/16 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 26 AS 432/12 | 18.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 693/15 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 AL 1712/18 | 11.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 142/19 | 12.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 KR 3754/19 ER | 16.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 23. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 (5, 22) KR 250/05 | 16.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 59/07 | 05.02.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 18 KN 74/06 | 09.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 23. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 51 R 657/15 | 16.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 23. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 7 KN 58/17 | 17.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 23. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 14 R 1328/13 | 13.05.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 R 5084/16 | 27.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5037/13 | 30.06.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 287/14 | 19.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 35/17 R | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 66 AS 5440/17 | 16.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 2310/17 | 20.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 44/18 R | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 U 362/14 | 10.06.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 124/15 | 04.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 31/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 SO 717/15 | 02.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 2037/17 | 19.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/18 R | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 480/12 | 15.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 490/15 | 23.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KS 2/18 R | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 442 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 442 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 442 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 96/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-96-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-96-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 36/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-36-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-36-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 9/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-9-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-9-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 338/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-338-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-338-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 263/14 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-263-14-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-263-14-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 455/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-455-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-455-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 381/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-381-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-381-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 584/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-584-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-584-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161466 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 481/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-481-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-481-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 343/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-343-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-343-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 345/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-345-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-345-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161459 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 32/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-32-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-32-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161457 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 693/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-693-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:41:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:41:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-693-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153667 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 142/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-142-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-142-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 KR 3754/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-kr-3754-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-kr-3754-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 (5, 22) KR 250/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-5-22-kr-250-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-5-22-kr-250-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133743 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KN 74/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kn-74-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kn-74-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133742 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 R 657/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-r-657-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:17:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:17:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-r-657-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KN 58/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kn-58-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kn-58-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 5084/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-5084-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-5084-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 35/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-35-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-35-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 44/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-44-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-44-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 31/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-31-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-31-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KS 2/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-ks-2-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-ks-2-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 96/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-96-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-96-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 52b08c97f4791a64f2c624a6e3af7845 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fd9fab26d14c59a9ded67047741bdbf8:0.18235200 1758497439 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.