| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 5 SO 26/11 | 04.06.2013 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 282/13 | 23.02.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 15/17 R | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 3 U 68/14 | 18.07.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 168/16 | 12.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 27/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 3371/13 | 15.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3288/16 | 31.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 63/17 R | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 36 EG 40/16 | 24.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 EG 22/16 | 12.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 8/17 R | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 472/11 | 28.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 52/14 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 27/18 B | 15.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 RS 123/17 | 11.07.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 606/18 ZV | 16.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 R 1776/18 ZV | 17.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 314/19 ZV | 16.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 13 RS 670/16 | 06.03.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 310/19 ZV | 16.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 26 R 1474/18 ZV | 25.01.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 160/19 ZV | 16.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 21/18 KL | 17.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 22. Januar 2020 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 R 3713/16 | 02.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 1226/18 | 25.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 26 RJ 89/04 | 18.11.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 RJ 141/04 | 11.05.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 22. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 1 R 1046/12 | 28.10.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 26 SF 295/12 E | 27.08.2012 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 2 SB 366/17 | 03.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 2623/18 | 13.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 743/18 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Reutlingen | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 14 KR 656/15 | 24.10.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Lübeck | 22. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 SB 1734/19 | 16.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 21. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 39 AS 1759/18 | 27.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 21. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 129 AS 22469/12 | 22.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 2294/16 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 169 KR 1244/19 ER | 09.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 365/19 B ER | 18.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 569/17 | 15.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 16/18 | 14.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 40/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 1504/14 | 08.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 143/16 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 981/19 | 10.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 20. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 443 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 443 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 443 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 15/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-15-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-15-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87245 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 27/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-27-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-27-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87240 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 63/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-63-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-63-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87235 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 8/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-8-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-8-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 27/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-27-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-27-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 606/18 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-606-18-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-606-18-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 314/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-314-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-314-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160187 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 310/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-310-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-310-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 160/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-160-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-160-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 21/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-21-18-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-21-18-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1226/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1226-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1226-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 RJ 89/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-rj-89-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-rj-89-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 1046/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-1046-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-1046-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 SF 295/12 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-sf-295-12-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-sf-295-12-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SB 366/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-sb-366-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-sb-366-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 2623/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-2623-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-2623-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 743/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-743-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-743-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 656/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-656-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:00:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:00:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-656-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 SB 1734/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-sb-1734-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-sb-1734-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131522 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 AS 1759/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-as-1759-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-as-1759-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 2294/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-2294-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-2294-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126117 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 365/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-365-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-365-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 16/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-16-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-16-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 143/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-143-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-143-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-20 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 981/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-981-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-981-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 15/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-15-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-15-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bdd2ab7d7cfac21cd42aaac7a1404842 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:cfb4704428d3b8cd563f9e6cb7ad275a:0.98463900 1758502428 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.