| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 11 U 2218/13 | 10.03.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1119/15 | 09.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 U 1322/18 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 891/19 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 R 4400/18 | 15.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1323/19 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 BA 3105/18 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 3565/19 B | 15.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 3953/19 ER | 18.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3980/19 ER-B | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 2609/18 | 06.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 794/19 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 KR 2019/18 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1176/19 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 KR 760/18 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1110/19 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 5806/18 | 15.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1934/19 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 12 KR 2546/17 | 20.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4062/18 | 10.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 4915/15 | 19.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2858/17 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 1845/16 | 13.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1522/18 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 4475/15 | 14.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 2333/17 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 KR 2884/18 | 24.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2554/19 | 11.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 11 U 2371/16 | 10.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2027/18 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 4244/17 | 25.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3196/18 | 02.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 1352/12 | 27.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 489/17 | 09.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 16 AS 1981/15 | 08.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 AS 25/18 | 22.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 5 AS 182/07 ER | 31.08.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 5 AS 217/07 ER | 04.07.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 KN 238/01 | 29.07.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 3 R 258/15 | 16.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 228/17 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 1514/18 | 27.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 U 114/13 | 13.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 445 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 445 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 445 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1119/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1119-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1119-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153640 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 891/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-891-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-891-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1323/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1323-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1323-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153633 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 3565/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-3565-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-3565-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3980/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3980-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3980-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153624 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 794/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-794-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-794-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153620 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1176/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1176-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1176-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1110/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1110-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1110-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1934/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1934-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1934-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4062/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4062-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4062-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153604 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 2858/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-2858-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-2858-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 1522/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-1522-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-1522-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153596 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 2333/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-2333-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-2333-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2554/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2554-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2554-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2027/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2027-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:02:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:02:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2027-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 3196/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-3196-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:51:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:51:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-3196-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 1352/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-1352-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-1352-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 489/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-489-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-489-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137480 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 25/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-25-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-25-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 182/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-182-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-182-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 217/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-217-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:45:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:45:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-217-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 KN 238/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-kn-238-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-kn-238-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 R 258/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-r-258-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-r-258-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 1514/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-1514-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-1514-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 114/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-114-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-114-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153644 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1119/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1119-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:04:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:04:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1119-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0592b5e5073da682763e2fee213269b0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5ffb3120d03d8abd20ca5798938769db:0.99595300 1758787035 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.