| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 BL 6/12 | 12.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 BL 2/15 | 17.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 18/11 | 06.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 15. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 3 R 258/15 | 16.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 228/17 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 1 AL 31/14 | 14.09.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 87/16 | 18.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 19/19 B | 01.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 KN 65/97 | 10.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 14. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 9 KR 61/05 | 20.06.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 61/07 | 07.05.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 KG 3/06 | 08.06.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 108/06 | 20.02.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 AL 181/05 | 31.10.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 106/07 | 03.03.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 13 U 116/17 | 22.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 234/18 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 48 R 386/16 | 04.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 437/17 | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 71/15 | 30.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 152/17 | 14.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 10 U 89/11 | 21.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 82/17 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 19 R 407/12 | 30.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 981/15 | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 54/16 KL | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 3/19 R | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 VE 16/11 | 15.05.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 VE 22/18 ZVW | 26.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 14/18 B | 27.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 VE 25/14 | 09.03.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 VE 7/17 | 09.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 20 AY 72/19 ER | 28.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 14/19 B ER | 13.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 BA 7/19 ER | 03.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 13. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 U 452/18 | 06.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 13. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 AS 864/14 | 18.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 337/16 | 22.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | N 14 AS 309/18 B | 17.10.2019 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 5 AS 1723/19 ER | 23.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 582/19 B ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 13. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 AS 864/14 | 18.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 337/16 | 22.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 309/18 B | 17.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Januar 2020 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 1025/18 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 10. Januar 2020 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 4 R 363/16 | 26.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 190/18 | 22.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 10. Januar 2020 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KA 1001/18 | 12.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 268/19 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Januar 2020 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 446 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 446 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 446 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 BL 6/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-bl-6-12-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-bl-6-12-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SO 18/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-so-18-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-so-18-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 228/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-228-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-228-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 87/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-87-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-87-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 KN 65/97 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-kn-65-97 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-kn-65-97/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132677 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KR 61/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kr-61-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kr-61-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132673 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KG 3/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kg-3-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kg-3-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132669 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AL 181/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-al-181-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-al-181-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126136 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 234/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-234-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-234-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 437/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-437-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-437-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 152/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-152-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-152-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 82/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-82-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-82-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 981/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-981-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:18:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:18:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-981-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 54/16 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-54-16-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-54-16-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 VE 22/18 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ve-22-18-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ve-22-18-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 VE 7/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ve-7-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ve-7-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 14/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-14-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-14-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143229 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 BA 7/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-ba-7-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-ba-7-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 452/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-452-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-452-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136126 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 864/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-864-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-864-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 1723/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-1723-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-1723-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 337/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-337-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-337-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SB 1025/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-sb-1025-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-sb-1025-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 363/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-363-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-363-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 268/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-268-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-268-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2020-01-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-01-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 BL 6/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-bl-6-12-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-bl-6-12-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b25563f48ef1242bd7e59f9889849ac9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9e596e89f04499fd0a158dda9e53e5f9:0.34799800 1758518258 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.