| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 27 P 14/23 ER | 22.03.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 P 40/24 B ER | - | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 167 AS 4291/14 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 5 AS 554/19 B | 01.10.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 62 BA 1/20 | 16.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2/1 BA 84/23 | 06.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 13. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 95/21 | 27.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 290/22 | 17.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 167/23 B | 30.04.2024 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Juni 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 95/21 | 27.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 290/22 | 17.10.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 167/23 B | 30.04.2024 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Juni 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 U 26/18 | 20.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 204/19 | 18.07.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 7/24 C | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 13. Juni 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 16 AS 47/21 | 17.10.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 13. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 9 SB 399/20 | 27.04.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 13. Juni 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 R 1634/20 | 19.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 85/23 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 R 1236/20 | 09.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3785/21 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 5 AS 1273/21 | 27.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 3334/22 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 2038/19 | 31.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3146/20 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 14 VG 1806/17 | 10.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 3480/23 ZVW | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 6 AL 49/22 | 24.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1836/22 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 R 3591/19 | 22.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1183/21 | 19.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 6388/18 | 21.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 1077/22 | 26.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 907/23 | 06.12.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 38/24 | 03.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 698/21 | 29.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 14/23 | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 BA 196/20 | 18.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 38/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 37/21 | 05.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 563/21 | 11.12.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 23 AL 2581/23 | 23.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 3450/23 | 26.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 AS 3387/21 | 08.01.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 492/24 | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 3 KR 611/18 | 03.12.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 26/22 | 31.01.2024 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 334/21 | 06.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 621/23 NZB | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Juni 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 85 R 866/20 | 25.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 9/23 | 21.02.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. Juni 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 45 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 45 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 45 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 P 40/24 ER B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-p-40-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-p-40-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 554/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-554-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-554-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2/1 BA 84/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-1-ba-84-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-1-ba-84-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 R 95/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-r-95-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-r-95-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 290/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-290-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:43:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:43:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-290-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 26/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-26-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-26-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 47/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-47-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-47-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SB 399/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-sb-399-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-sb-399-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 85/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-85-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-85-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160551 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3785/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3785-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3785-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160548 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 3334/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-3334-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-3334-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160546 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3146/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3146-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3146-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 3480/23 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-3480-23-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-3480-23-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160539 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 1836/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-1836-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-1836-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1183/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1183-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1183-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 1077/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-1077-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-1077-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 38/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-38-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-38-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 14/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-14-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-14-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 210 BA 196/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-210-ba-196-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:49:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:49:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-210-ba-196-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 563/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-563-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-563-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 3450/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-3450-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-3450-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 492/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-492-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:23:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:23:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-492-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150556 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 26/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-26-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-26-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 621/23 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-621-23-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-621-23-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129534 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 9/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-9-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:51:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:51:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-9-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-06-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-06-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 P 40/24 ER B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-p-40-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:52:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:52:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-p-40-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f885f5f614dfec60842e173d25acba0d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:445a2e699bfee6d62fbf40c9418902de:0.36038000 1745276290 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.