| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 10 R 1330/10 | 05.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 45/17 | 05.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 19. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 6 U 68/13 | 21.09.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1340/16 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 19. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 1443/17 | 12.11.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1590/18 | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 19. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 338/17 | 21.03.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 21/18 | 16.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 13 SB 104/14 | 09.08.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SB 143/16 | 10.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 35 KR 98/15 | 03.05.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 274/18 | 29.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 1347/19 ER | 19.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 213/19 B ER | 02.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 7 RS 481/16 | 02.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 496/19 ZV | 16.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 SF 3/19 DS | 19.03.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SV 5/19 B | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 SF 1/19 DS | 19.03.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SV 2/19 B | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 EG 423/18 | 10.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 4204/18 | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 4533/17 | 02.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 18. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 208/18 | 29.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 1642/19 | 11.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 18. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 KR 115/13 | 15.08.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | S 8 KR 425/16 | 14.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 18. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 59 SB 209/16 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 SB 324/17 | 07.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 10/19 C | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 18. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 27 KR 1102/12 | 02.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 46 AS 2230/15 | 06.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 SB 82/04 | 11.04.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 SB 54/06 | 19.12.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9a SB 9/07 B | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 17. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 6 SF 313/17 E | 27.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 59/06 | 24.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 KN 100/02 | 17.10.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 30 AS 2193/17 | 18.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 17. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 16 AS 2076/15 | 26.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 154/19 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 16. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 20 LW 2/16 | 23.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 16. Dezember 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 450 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 450 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 450 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1330/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1330-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1330-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 U 68/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-u-68-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-u-68-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 1443/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-1443-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-1443-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130121 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 21/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-21-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:58:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:58:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-21-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SB 143/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sb-143-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sb-143-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 274/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-274-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-274-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 213/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-213-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-213-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 496/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-496-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-496-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SV 5/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sv-5-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:18:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:18:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sv-5-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SV 2/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sv-2-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sv-2-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 4204/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-4204-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-4204-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 4533/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-4533-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-4533-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 208/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-208-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-208-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 1642/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-1642-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-1642-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 115/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-115-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-115-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 59 SB 209/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-59-sb-209-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-59-sb-209-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 1102/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-1102-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-1102-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 AS 2230/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-as-2230-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-as-2230-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140194 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SB 82/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-sb-82-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-sb-82-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137400 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 SF 313/17 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-sf-313-17-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-sf-313-17-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137396 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 59/06 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-59-06 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-59-06/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KN 100/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-kn-100-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-kn-100-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AS 2193/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-as-2193-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-as-2193-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 154/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-154-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-154-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 LW 2/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-lw-2-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-lw-2-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-19 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 1330/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-1330-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-1330-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0d71fa3bad65b2b530519f22c2de7f6d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:daef137831ca8526c986626c7b1bf23f:0.52779500 1758529061 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.