Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 16 AS 1230/11 | 25.01.2012 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 383/12 | 17.07.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 324/13 B | 09.04.2014 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 11. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AS 4062/18 | 15.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 11. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 AL 2577/19 | 04.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 11. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 14 AL 88/04 | 29.06.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 11. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 3 RJ 19/01 | 03.09.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 11. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 5480/13 | 20.06.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1026/16 | 08.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 11. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 12 AS 860/18 | 24.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 478/19 B | 18.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 EG 45/17 | 24.10.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 36/17 | 04.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 EG 45/17 | 24.10.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 36/17 | 04.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 31 AS 845/13 | 25.02.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 272/16 | 27.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 10. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 16/05 | 05.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 39 RJ 111/00 | 20.03.2002 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 AS 4801/14 | 29.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 3886/15 | 14.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 4342/19 ER | 29.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 1588/19 | 10.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 22 AS 31/05 ER | 04.05.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Köln | S 34 KR 807/13 | 17.10.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 10. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 28 AS 448/18 | 01.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 276/19 B | 30.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 26 P 29/13 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 P 8/15 | 22.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 R 956/13 | 12.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 BA 34/18 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 19 P 74/14 | 21.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 P 21/18 | 23.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 41 AL 196/14 | 14.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 27/17 B | 08.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 13 AS 3321/14 WA | 15.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 47/16 | 06.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 19 AS 1253/18 ER | 27.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 489/19 B ER | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 452 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 452 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 452 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1230/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1230-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1230-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 4062/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-4062-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-4062-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 2577/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-2577-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:13:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:13:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-2577-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134541 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 88/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-88-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-88-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 RJ 19/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-rj-19-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-rj-19-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 5480/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-5480-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-5480-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 478/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-478-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-478-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 36/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-36-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-36-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 36/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-36-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-36-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 272/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-272-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-272-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 16/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-16-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-16-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 RJ 111/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-rj-111-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-rj-111-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 AS 4801/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-as-4801-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-as-4801-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 3886/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-3886-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-3886-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 AS 4342/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-as-4342-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-as-4342-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 1588/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-1588-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-1588-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AS 31/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-as-31-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-as-31-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 807/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-807-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-807-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 276/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-276-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-276-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 8/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-8-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-8-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 34/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-34-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-34-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 21/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-21-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-21-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 27/17 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-27-17-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-27-17-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 47/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-47-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-47-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 489/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-489-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-489-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1230/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1230-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1230-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ca566a3d138b4a374ab4362e4d6f2324 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3e562999a8ccd1002e2d5c350ad783b6:0.99444300 1758539884 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.