Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 U 65/13 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 158/14 | 18.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 239/18 B | 30.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AL 75/13 | 12.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 54/15 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 42/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 24 AS 1081/12 | 13.03.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 443/14 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AL 339/13 | 12.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AL 52/15 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 KR 1410/17 | 14.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 516/19 | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 1037/18 | 02.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 AS 3925/16 | 02.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 21 SB 1168/14 | 30.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 7 AS 149/07 ER | 09.08.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 B 184/07 AS ER | 07.11.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 KR 340/14 | 03.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 447/17 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 SO 37/17 ER | 10.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 54/17 B ER | 25.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 202/16 ER | 11.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 26/17 B ER | 24.07.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 9. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 13 AS 2857/13 ER | 24.02.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 123/14 B ER | 29.04.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 8 AS 2847/12 | 07.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 32/16 | 15.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 AS 595/15 | 07.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 858/16 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 KR 307/18 ER | 28.11.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 1/19 B ER | 21.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 KR 571/17 | 27.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 136/18 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 KR 571/17 | 27.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 136/18 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 16 AS 1230/11 | 25.01.2012 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 383/12 | 17.07.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 145 SO 1717/17 ER | 18.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 280/17 B ER | 04.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 7 R 105/15 | 19.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 447/17 | 30.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 50 SO 825/12 | 31.03.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 142/14 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 10025/18 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1832/19 B PKH | 16.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
- | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 SF 84/19 E | 06.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |||
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 6 AS 926/15 | 02.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1347/18 | 23.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 453 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 453 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 453 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11300, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 158/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-158-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-158-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 54/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-54-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-54-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161374 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 443/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-443-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-443-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 52/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-52-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-52-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 516/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-516-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:02:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:02:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-516-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 1037/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-1037-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-1037-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 AS 3925/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-as-3925-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-as-3925-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 SB 1168/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-sb-1168-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-sb-1168-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AS 149/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-as-149-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-as-149-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 340/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-340-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-340-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 SO 37/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-so-37-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-so-37-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133163 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SO 202/16 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-so-202-16-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-so-202-16-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 123/14 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-123-14-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-123-14-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 32/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-32-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-32-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 858/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-858-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-858-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 1/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-1-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-1-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 136/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-136-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-136-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 136/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-136-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-136-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 383/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-383-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-383-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 280/17 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-280-17-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-280-17-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 447/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-447-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-447-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126065 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 142/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-142-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-142-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1832/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1832-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1832-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 SF 84/19 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-sf-84-19-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-sf-84-19-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1347/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1347-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1347-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 158/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-158-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-158-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 9e4e5cca5c62bd320eec11950e14a6f5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:bb1cf93222b3d5ab9d742c529a194d2f:0.47096700 1758539870 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.