| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 12 AL 164/09 | 09.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 208/17 | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 38 SF 323/18 EK AS | 06.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 35 AL 2924/15 | 10.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 128/18 | 20.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 259/14 | 14.04.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 97/15 | 31.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 1/19 R | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 28 SO 210/12 | 24.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 SO 85/17 | 12.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| S 26 AS 550/15 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 4 AS 75/19 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 4 R 1090/14 | 01.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 96/17 | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 55 R 1609/12 | 25.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 77/18 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| S 51 R 429/13 | 01.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 31/19 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 P 144/13 | 30.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 P 2/17 | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| S 36 U 67/17 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 45/18 | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| S 36 U 77/15 | 30.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 16/17 | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| S 9 KR 260/14 | 11.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 89/18 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 AS 716/19 | 14.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 1665/19 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 240/18 | 24.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 5 (16) KR 86/00 | 31.03.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 (2) KR 51/04 | 21.06.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 47 AS 422/05 ER | 08.09.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 81/05 ER | 07.12.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 68/16 | 07.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 5. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 16 AS 27/05 | 01.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 35/06 | 06.08.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 16 AS 27/05 | 01.02.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 35/06 | 06.08.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 KR 100/16 | 17.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 373/18 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 137/14 | 22.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 25/17 | 23.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 6/18 R | 11.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 899/14 | 24.11.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 539/15 | 13.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 6/18 R | 16.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 5. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 20 KR 9/17 | 14.02.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 103/19 B PKH | 13.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 27 KR 1266/16 | 30.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 4. Dezember 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 454 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 454 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 454 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 208/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-208-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-208-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 38 SF 323/18 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-38-sf-323-18-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-38-sf-323-18-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 128/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-128-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-128-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 1/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-1-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-1-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 85/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-85-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-85-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 75/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-75-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-75-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 96/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-96-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-96-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 77/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-77-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-77-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 31/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-31-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-31-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 P 2/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-p-2-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-p-2-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158742 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158738 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 16/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-16-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-16-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 89/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-89-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-89-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153100 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1665/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1665-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1665-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 240/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-240-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-240-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 (16) KR 86/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-16-kr-86-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-16-kr-86-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 AS 422/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-as-422-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-as-422-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 68/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-68-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-68-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 27/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-27-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-27-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132653 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 27/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-27-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-27-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 373/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-373-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-373-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 25/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-25-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:05:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:05:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-25-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 539/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-539-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:03:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:03:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-539-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 103/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-103-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-103-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 KR 1266/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-kr-1266-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-kr-1266-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 208/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-208-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-208-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 238b2de9358abd864e1d973eaa6ab3c4 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5523313ba08b01571f29afa2e3bea0de:0.43475000 1758554219 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.