| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 339/19 ER | 10.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 4. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 783/18 | 14.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 4. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 AS 32/05 ER | 26.01.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 B 49/05 AS ER | 29.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 8 KR 606/15 | 09.11.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 482/17 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 KR 345/02 | 05.06.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 139/03 | 04.12.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 9 KA 136/04 | 09.12.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | S 11 KA 46/05 | 14.09.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 SF 308/18 E | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 4. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 P 132/19 ER | 01.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 4. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 21 KR 1290/19 ER | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 628/19 B ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 16 SO 92/05 | 13.12.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 28/06 | 26.09.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 116/07 ER | 06.09.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 B 260/07 AS ER | 22.10.0207 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 4. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 KR 418/19 | 26.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Würzburg | 4. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 SO 1267/18 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 934/19 | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 688/17 KL | 19.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Dezember 2019 | |||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 AL 2025/15 | 20.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 3147/17 | 23.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 KR 10/16 | 16.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 265/17 | 01.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/18 R | 08.08.2019 | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. Dezember 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 KR 187/07 ER | 01.10.2007 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 3. Dezember 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 18 KR 337/15 | 23.11.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 206/18 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 31/19 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 647/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 13 AS 941/15 | 16.08.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 620/16 | 28.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 1 U 5037/13 | 30.06.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 287/14 | 19.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 5 SB 329/13 | 13.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 158/17 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 32 SB 101/16 | 01.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 233/18 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Dezember 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1779/16 | 10.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 176/18 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 66/19 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. Dezember 2019 |
| - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 P 29/19 ER | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 455 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 455 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 455 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 339/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-339-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-339-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143015 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 783/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-783-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-783-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140187 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 32/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-32-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-32-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 606/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-606-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-606-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137388 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 345/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-345-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-345-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KA 136/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-ka-136-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-ka-136-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 SF 308/18 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-sf-308-18-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-sf-308-18-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134517 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 27 P 132/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-27-p-132-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-27-p-132-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 1290/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-1290-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-1290-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132646 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SO 92/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-so-92-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-so-92-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 116/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-116-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-116-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132501 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 418/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-418-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-418-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153545 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 934/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-934-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-934-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 688/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-688-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:03:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:03:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-688-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 3147/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-3147-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:43:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:43:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-3147-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 10/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-10-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-10-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 187/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-187-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-187-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 337/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-337-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-337-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132635 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 31/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-31-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-31-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 620/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-620-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:47:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:47:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-620-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 287/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-287-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-287-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126043 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 158/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-158-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-158-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 126039 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 233/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-233-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-233-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 176/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-176-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-176-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 P 29/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-p-29-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-p-29-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 339/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-339-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-339-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 54e27f72f82234e756f9bad11af61542 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:232ac99d62055bfadcf1b56c3eb50b78:0.57157700 1758549488 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.