Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 452/17 | 20.12.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 63/19 | 27.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 165/15 | 03.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 14/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 2. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 553/14 | 16.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 509/17 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 69/18 B | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 700/18 | 26.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. Dezember 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 R 450/17 | 26.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 38/18 | 31.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 2. Dezember 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 KA 310/00 | 30.04.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 84/06 | 11.05.2011 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 13/05 R | 31.05.2006 | Sozialgericht Köln | 2. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AS 107/17 | 29.09.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 506/17 | 14.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 29/18 BH | 26.08.2019 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 2. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 158/12 | 20.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 120/18 | 14.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 125/19 B | 05.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. Dezember 2019 |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 19 AY 1/06 ER | 31.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 B 14/06 AY ER | 08.05.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 29. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 204/05 ER | 02.01.2006 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 B 6/06 AS ER | 07.04.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 29. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 6 KR 447/19 ER | 03.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 397/19 B ER | 07.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 1563/15 | 07.12.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 66/18 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 | |
- | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 644/18 KL | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 4/19 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 | ||
- | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 644/18 KL | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 A 4/19 R | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 5 R 132/10 | 04.04.2011 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2/12 R 382/11 | 01.07.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 4/19 R | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht für das Saarland | S 23 KR 804/15 | 08.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht für das Saarland | L 2 KR 60/16 | 12.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 21/18 R | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 1421/16 | 19.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 771/17 | 05.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 18/18 R | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 9 AL 156/12 | 08.04.2014 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 1 AL 30/14 | 28.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 11/18 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 3 EG 870/15 | 01.09.2015 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 EG 1402/15 | 15.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 1/18 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 16/17 | 30.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 51/17 | 29.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 17/18 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 31 AL 894/13 | 17.02.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 42/14 | 01.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 14/18 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 84 AL 609/14 | 01.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 26/18 | 08.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 18/18 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 2 AL 164/14 | 30.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 101/17 | 25.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 8/18 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 SO 81/14 | 30.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 244/16 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 10/18 R | 04.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 2 SO 12/13 | 14.08.2013 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 397/13 | 23.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/17 R | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 29. November 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 456 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 456 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 456 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 63/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-63-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-63-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144796 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 165/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-165-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-165-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KR 553/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-kr-553-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-kr-553-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 700/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-700-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-700-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136122 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 450/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-450-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-450-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134512 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KA 310/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ka-310-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ka-310-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134465 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 107/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-107-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-107-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 120/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-120-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-120-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AY 1/06 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-ay-1-06-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-ay-1-06-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 204/05 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-204-05-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-204-05-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 397/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-397-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-397-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 66/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-66-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-66-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 644/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-644-18-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-644-18-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 644/18 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-644-18-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-644-18-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 4/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-4-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-4-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 21/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-21-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-21-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87326 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 18/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-18-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:58:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:58:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-18-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 11/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-11-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-11-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87269 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 17/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-17-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-17-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 14/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-14-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-14-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 18/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-18-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-18-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 8/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-8-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-8-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 10/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-10-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-10-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 13/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-13-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-13-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 63/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-63-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-63-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 69d3d396260e56905f366281800af4f6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ad9a5bc1027ffcfaaadbbddf478324d7:0.83187000 1758559260 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.