Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 454/15 | 10.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 36/16 | 03.03.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 184/17 | 02.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 36/16 | 03.03.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 184/17 | 02.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 753/14 | 22.02.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 146/17 | 29.08.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 142/15 | 22.02.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 18 KR 83/14 | 30.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 340/15 | 30.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 131/17 | 21.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 756/14 | 19.12.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 732/14 | 15.11.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 541/16 | 22.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 18 R 625/16 | 23.03.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 11. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 3814/16 | 04.09.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1261/17 | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 11. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 23 R 2245/16 | 05.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 264/18 | 12.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/19 R | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 KR 68/04 | 23.02.2005 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 10/05 | 22.02.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 29/06 B | 11.07.2006 | Sozialgericht Aachen | 8. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 AL 20/04 | 03.09.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 8. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 60 AS 2236/19 ER | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 935/19 | 09.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 8 RA 124/98 | 17.12.1999 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8 RA 11/20 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 22 R 264/15 | 30.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 487/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 2 KR 145/15 | 27.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 372/16 | 01.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 148/14 | 23.02.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 110/15 | 07.07.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 9 R 146/14 | 23.07.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 303/15 | 22.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 105/19 B | 01.10.2019 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 8. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 20 SF 359/17 E | 13.12.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 227/19 B | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 17 SF 1150/16 E | 03.11.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 69/18 B | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 SB 2394/15 | 15.05.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 5 SB 746/17 B | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 30/17 | 08.01.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 165/18 | 05.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Meiningen | 8. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 BK 4/15 | 15.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BK 10/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 464 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 464 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 464 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 454/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-454-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-454-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 36/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-36-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-36-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 36/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-36-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-36-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 753/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-753-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-753-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 142/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-142-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-142-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 83/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-83-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-83-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 340/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-340-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-340-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 756/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-756-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-756-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 732/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-732-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:33:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:33:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-732-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 625/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-625-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-625-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 3814/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-3814-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-3814-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 33 R 264/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-33-r-264-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:09:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:09:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-33-r-264-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 KR 68/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-kr-68-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-kr-68-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AL 20/04 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-al-20-04 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-al-20-04/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137362 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 AS 2236/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-as-2236-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-as-2236-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RA 124/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-ra-124-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-ra-124-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 R 264/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-r-264-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-r-264-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 145/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-145-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-145-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 148/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-148-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-148-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134437 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 146/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-146-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-146-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SF 359/17 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-sf-359-17-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-sf-359-17-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SF 1150/16 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-sf-1150-16-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-sf-1150-16-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131370 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SB 2394/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sb-2394-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sb-2394-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 U 30/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-u-30-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:51:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:51:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-u-30-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BK 10/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-bk-10-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-bk-10-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 454/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-454-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-454-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ccb7efe819602cc336766d7d73690dc2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0e73973de0c7d2d0d966e24e7b45d5d5:0.69143100 1758636378 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.