| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 21 P 57/17 | 09.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 63/18 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 22 R 264/15 | 30.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 487/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 22 R 264/15 | 30.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 487/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 22 R 264/15 | 30.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 487/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 2 KR 145/15 | 27.06.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 372/16 | 23.02.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 148/14 | 23.02.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 110/15 | 07.07.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 8. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 2 R 5728/16 | 13.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 3931/18 | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 AS 2264/17 | 14.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 2481/18 | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 29 SB 79/03 | 28.05.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. November 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 21 R 36/14 | 17.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 05.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 7. November 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 1244/15 | 28.08.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 114/16 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 557/16 | 13.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 22/18 | 26.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 938/16 | 27.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 79/18 NZB | 12.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 3012/14 | 22.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 4632/16 | 27.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 7/18 R | 07.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 SO 137/15 | 12.04.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 95/16 | 07.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 10/17 R | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 SO 2946/09 | 03.03.2011 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1447/11 | 25.06.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 9/18 R (B 8 SO 10/16 R) | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 SO 315/13 | 23.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 435/14 | 24.08.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 7/17 R | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 SO 4135/15 | 15.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1273/16 | 27.06.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 2/17 R | 06.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. November 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 23 AS 1971/12 | 11.09.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 6. November 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 KR 31/19 ER | 29.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 6. November 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 R 527/16 | 21.03.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 502/18 | 31.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 6. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 20 SO 218/07 ER | 18.12.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 20/08 B ER | 20.03.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 6. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 552/18 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 6. November 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 61/16 | 09.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 236/17 | 13.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 6. November 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 2957/18 | 05.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1582/19 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. November 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 465 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 63/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-63-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-63-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 487/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-487-16-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-487-16-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129756 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 487/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-487-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-487-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 487/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-487-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-487-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128496 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 372/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-372-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:40:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:40:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-372-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 110/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-110-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-110-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 3931/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-3931-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-3931-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153386 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 2481/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-2481-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:01:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:01:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-2481-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 SB 79/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-sb-79-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-sb-79-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 R 36/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-r-36-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-r-36-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 114/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-114-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-114-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 22/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-22-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-22-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130090 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 79/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-79-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-79-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 7/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-7-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-7-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 10/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-10-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-10-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 9/18 R (B 8 SO 10/16 R) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-9-18-r-b-8-so-10-16-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-9-18-r-b-8-so-10-16-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 7/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-7-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-7-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 2/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-2-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-2-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 AS 1971/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-as-1971-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:08:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:08:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-as-1971-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 31/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-31-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-31-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136081 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 527/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-527-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-527-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 218/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-218-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-218-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 552/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-552-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-552-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 236/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-236-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-236-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1582/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1582-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:01:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:01:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1582-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 63/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-63-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-63-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 810379266158cc27b8f8ded0aba9247a [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:af2f465b8703172bdf27811ea967bae7:0.75245600 1758647093 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.