Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 154/12 | 05.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 379/15 | 09.03.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 8 AS 646/18 | 15.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 317/19 | 16.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 1598/15 | 20.11.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 46/16 | 26.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 1598/15 | 20.11.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 46/16 | 26.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 AS 417/15 | 16.02.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 334/16 | 29.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 AS 154/12 | 05.11.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 379/15 | 09.03.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 162 P 264/18 | 27.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 P 47/19 B PKH | 14.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 5975/19 ER | 19.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1644/19 B ER | 02.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 414/12 | 28.04.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 265/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 1. November 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 R 404/15 | 12.12.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. November 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 9 R 146/14 | 23.07.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 303/15 | 22.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 105/19 B | 01.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 1. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 57 AL 1697/16 | 01.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 65/19 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 52/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 11 R 2020/17 | 11.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 549/18 | 03.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 10/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 66 AS 5440/17 | 16.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 2310/17 | 20.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 44/18 R | 11.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 188 R 5274/09 | 17.09.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 R 876/13 | 13.04.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 197/17 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. November 2019 |
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 AL 134/03 | 04.12.2003 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 31. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 741/16 | 22.05.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 427/17 | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 31. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 33 EG 2/15 | 21.10.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 10/16 | 23.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 3/18 R | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Oktober 2019 |
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 10 KR 3225/15 | 02.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1321/16 | 25.04.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 15/17 R | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 31. Oktober 2019 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 U 1157/19 | 17.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 32/14 | 12.04.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 152/18 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 30. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 121 AS 6388/19 ER | 10.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1714/19 B ER | 07.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 368/15 | 06.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 334/18 | 14.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 182 KR 322/19 ER | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 196/19 B ER | 22.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 96 U 398/15 | 07.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 159/19 WA | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 467 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 467 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 467 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AS 154/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-as-154-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-as-154-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130033 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 317/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-317-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-317-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 46/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-46-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-46-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130000 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 46/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-46-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-46-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128573 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 334/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-334-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-334-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128198 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 379/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-379-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-379-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 P 47/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-p-47-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-p-47-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 1644/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-1644-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-1644-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 KR 414/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-kr-414-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-kr-414-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136071 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 404/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-404-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-404-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 303/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-303-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-303-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 65/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-65-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-65-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 549/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-549-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-549-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 2310/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-2310-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:07:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:07:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-2310-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 123654 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 876/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-876-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 21:55:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 20:55:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-876-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AL 134/03 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-al-134-03 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-al-134-03/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 427/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-427-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-427-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 3/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-3-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-3-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 15/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-15-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-15-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 1157/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-1157-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-1157-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 32/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-32-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-32-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 1714/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-1714-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-1714-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 334/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-334-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-334-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125984 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 196/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-196-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-196-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 159/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-159-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-159-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-11-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-11-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 AS 154/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-as-154-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-as-154-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4017a7427b8cb1dcafd5cb44cc4b0a3c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b70527945339f1423ab241c407e531a0:0.07975000 1758653098 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.