| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 69 R 139/17 | 20.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 R 617/17 | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 30. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 2/17 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 29. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5170/16 | 29.01.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 29. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 (8) AL 208/02 | 19.02.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 88/04 | 25.01.2006 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 U 1297/19 | 17.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 29. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 5 AS 428/07 ER | 11.07.2007 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 234/07 ER | 05.12.2007 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 34/11 | 20.02.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 48/13 | 02.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AY 64/19 ER | 24.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 29. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 203/09 | 25.01.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 63/13 | 17.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 107/10 | 24.01.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 175/17 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 34/11 | 20.02.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 48/13 | 02.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 785/10 | 10.08.2012 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 66/19 WA | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 12 KR 193/13 | 02.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 85/18 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 115/16 | 17.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 525/17 | 26.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 4701/15 | 16.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 69/16 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 4608/15 | 16.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 70/16 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 28 AS 727/19 ER | 04.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 520/19 B ER | 05.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 1091/12 | 25.05.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 472/18 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 18 U 1911/15 | 14.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4819/16 | 24.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 25 R 1505/15 | 26.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BA 2028/18 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 AL 514/19 | 12.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 1238/19 B | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 R 125/16 | 13.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BA 704/18 | 17.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 83/18 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 28. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KA 393/15 | 30.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 48 BA 59/19 ER | 30.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 28. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 468 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 468 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 468 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 617/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-617-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-617-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 2/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-2-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-2-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5170/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5170-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5170-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 (8) AL 208/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-8-al-208-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-8-al-208-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 1297/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-1297-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-1297-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138729 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 428/07 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-428-07-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-428-07-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 34/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-34-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-34-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 64/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-64-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-64-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 63/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-63-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-63-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 175/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-175-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-175-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 48/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-48-13-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-48-13-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125993 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 66/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-66-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:17:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:17:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-66-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 85/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-85-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-85-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 525/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-525-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-525-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125919 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 69/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-69-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-69-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 70/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-70-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-70-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 520/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-520-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-520-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 472/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-472-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-472-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 4819/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-4819-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-4819-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 2028/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-2028-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:01:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:01:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-2028-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153337 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 1238/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-1238-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-1238-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 704/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-704-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-704-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150007 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 83/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-83-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-83-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144760 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 KA 393/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-ka-393-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-ka-393-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 BA 59/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-ba-59-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-ba-59-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 617/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-617-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-617-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 52f8633d7148627bdf534bf2202afab9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:3806949c66ecd8fb4f8257bc21e32f45:0.74118700 1758647795 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.