| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 55/14 | 06.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 24 KA 47/16 | 13.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 612/19 ER | 02.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 288/19 B ER | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 5 LW 4/19 ER | 16.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 LW 5/19 B ER | 05.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 106 R 1875/15 | 17.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 R 277/17 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 34 AS 6040/12 | 05.02.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 442/15 | 30.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 303/18 B | 02.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 34 AS 7/15 | 23.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 543/15 | 30.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 303/18 B | 02.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 22. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 205 AS 7068/19 ER | 30.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 22. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 42 RJ 49/98 | 07.08.2000 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 22. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 160/13 | 12.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 218/16 | 16.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 34 AL 12/13 (SG Itzehoe) | 21.03.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 12/17 | 15.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 SB 652/18 | 15.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 21. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 R 1171/16 | 23.11.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 19/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 21. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 16 KA 71/19 | 12.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 21. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 EG 5/15 | 31.05.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 EG 18/16 | 03.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 21. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 7 SO 171/17 ER | 12.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SO 171/17 ER | 04.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 21. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 123/14 | 22.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 175/16 | 02.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 21. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 14 R 1125/12 | 27.11.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 18. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 166/17 | 20.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 122/19 | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 18 AS 1332/13 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 473/17 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 18 AS 2272/13 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 474/17 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 18 AS 2909/12 | 21.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 472/17 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 19 AS 427/15 | 03.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 466/18 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 15 R 342/10 | 14.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 469/15 B | 09.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 12 R 598/13 | 31.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 355/16 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 SO 172/11 | 06.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 33/14 | 06.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 71/18 B | 17.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 471 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 471 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 471 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 47/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-47-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-47-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 288/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-288-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-288-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 LW 5/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-lw-5-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-lw-5-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 277/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-277-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-277-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 442/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-442-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-442-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 543/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-543-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:34:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:34:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-543-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149991 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 205 AS 7068/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-205-as-7068-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-205-as-7068-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137355 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 RJ 49/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-rj-49-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-rj-49-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125976 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 218/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-218-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-218-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 12/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-12-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-12-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 652/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-652-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-652-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 1171/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-1171-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-1171-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137351 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KA 71/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ka-71-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ka-71-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 EG 5/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-eg-5-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:20:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:20:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-eg-5-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 171/17 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-171-17-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-171-17-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 123/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-123-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-123-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 R 1125/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-r-1125-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-r-1125-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 122/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-122-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-122-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 473/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-473-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-473-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 474/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-474-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-474-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 472/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-472-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-472-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 466/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-466-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-466-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 469/15 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-469-15-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-469-15-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 355/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-355-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-355-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161397 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 33/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-33-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-33-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 24 KA 47/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-24-ka-47-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-24-ka-47-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e3f59ab2d8c05a434359337d1a355576 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:68b3cc905eb1c3784654bfa173b3abbd:0.52492800 1758664074 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.