Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 VE 18/15 | 29.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 VE 11/18 | 13.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 23/19 B | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 17. Oktober 2019 |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 AL 6152/16 | 10.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 1928/17 | 20.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 12211/18 | 18.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 17. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 88/19 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 88/19 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 17. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 2980/17 | 03.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 17. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 125/19 ER | 05.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 160/19 B ER | 09.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 64 KR 430/12 | 25.07.2014 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 1 R 511/14 | 26.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 12/18 R | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2019 |
- | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 31/15 KL | 14.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/18 R | 29.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Stade | S 11 U 80/11 | 15.10.2014 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 267/14 | 28.10.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 26/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2019 |
Sozialgericht Kiel | S 13 KA 213/10 | 28.06.2012 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 14/12 | 02.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 27/17 R | 27.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2019 |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 AY 812/18 | 05.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 3535/18 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 AS 385/19 ER | 16.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 14 AS 385/19 ER | 16.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 18 SB 17/18 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 47 KR 196/13 | 30.11.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 158/18 | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 2 KR 974/14 | 16.04.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 174/17 | 20.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 18 R 78/13 | 26.03.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 16. Oktober 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 14 KR 414/12 | 28.04.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 265/16 | 18.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2019 | |
- | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 103/17 KL | 22.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Oktober 2019 | |||
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 32 SB 178/16 | 08.03.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SB 36/17 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 365/16 | 13.07.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 601/17 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 11 KR 847/16 ER | 16.05.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 506/17 B ER | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 472 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 472 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 472 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 VE 11/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ve-11-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ve-11-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 1928/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-1928-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-1928-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149985 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 37 AS 12211/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-37-as-12211-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-37-as-12211-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 88/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-88-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-88-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 88/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-88-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-88-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137345 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KR 2980/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-kr-2980-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-kr-2980-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 160/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-160-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-160-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 12/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-12-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-12-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 1/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-1-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-1-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 26/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-26-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:57:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:57:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-26-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 27/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-27-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:51:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:51:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-27-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 3535/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-3535-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-3535-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 385/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-385-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-385-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AS 385/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-as-385-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-as-385-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SB 17/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-sb-17-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-sb-17-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 KR 196/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-kr-196-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-kr-196-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 158/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-158-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-158-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 974/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-974-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-974-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 174/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-174-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-174-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 78/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-78-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-78-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129830 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 265/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-265-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-265-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 103/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-103-17-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-103-17-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SB 36/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-sb-36-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-sb-36-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 601/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-601-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-601-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 506/17 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-506-17-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-506-17-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 VE 11/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ve-11-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ve-11-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c674d1466f2a6ec6bee679a261bdda64 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a06785957cac1fa5bbb8ae2f1539d6b4:0.29041500 1758664096 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.