| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 237/11 | 21.05.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 193/14 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 3233/11 | 27.05.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 385/18 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 8 AL 198/14 | 28.02.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 72/18 | 25.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 24 AS 323/15 | 14.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 764/16 | 15.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 15. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 AY 16/19 ER | 27.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 15. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 BA 58/18 | 17.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 15. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 26 AL 230/18 ER | 18.12.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 19/19 B ER | 17.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 793/12 | 24.04.2013 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 108/13 | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 34/19 R | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 KR 668/15 | 18.01.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 82/17 | 11.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 37/19 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KA 112/18 ER | 17.07.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 11/18 B ER | 18.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 14. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 7 SB 3074/17 | 20.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 491/19 | 30.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 73 KR 176/18 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 14. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 3 U 8/18 | 28.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 660/18 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 14. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 196/16 | 09.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 228/17 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 14. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 4 KR 369/12 | 03.11.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 411/17 | 02.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 1 R 292/16 | 24.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 252/17 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 1 R 292/16 | 24.02.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 252/17 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 17 KR 368/19 ER | 01.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 479/19 B ER | 08.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 R 2153/13 | 20.02.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 234/15 | 09.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 22/18 R | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 305/15 | 05.02.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 15/16 | 21.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 14/17 R | 29.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 30 LW 91/13 | 20.11.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 LW 2/14 | 29.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 LW 1/17 R | 28.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 11/15 | 25.02.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 18/15 | 14.12.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 50/17 R | 12.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 KA 6360/14 | 14.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 4823/15 | 26.10.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 28/17 R | 24.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 27 KA 159/14 u.a. | 07.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 5 KA 16/15, L 5 KA 17/15, L 5 KA 18/15 | 15.03.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 47/17 R | 08.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 23/18 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 10. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 473 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 473 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 473 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 193/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-193-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-193-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 385/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-385-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-385-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 72/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-72-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-72-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144810 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 AS 323/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-as-323-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-as-323-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AY 16/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ay-16-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ay-16-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137342 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 BA 58/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-ba-58-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-ba-58-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 19/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-19-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-19-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 108/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-108-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-108-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 82/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-82-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-82-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 11/18 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-11-18-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-11-18-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 491/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-491-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-491-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149979 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 73 KR 176/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-73-kr-176-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-73-kr-176-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 8/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-8-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-8-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 196/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-196-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-196-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 411/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-411-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-411-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 252/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-252-17-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-252-17-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 252/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-252-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-252-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 479/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-479-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-479-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87290 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 22/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-22-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-22-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 14/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-14-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-14-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 LW 1/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-lw-1-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-lw-1-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 50/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-50-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-50-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87114 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 28/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-28-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:52:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:52:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-28-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87070 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 47/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-47-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:51:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:51:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-47-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 23/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-23-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-23-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 193/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-193-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:17:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:17:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-193-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4f6bb664383a47dc0af61791f6afda57 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:cc6bc0633ac91811e0c649d5eec6d31e:0.86636000 1758676344 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.