| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 7 U 365/12 | 25.10.2013 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 10. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 28 KR 704/16 | 24.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 10. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 SO 721/14 | 05.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 4668/15 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 2714/15 | 17.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 4349/16 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 9 U 61/18 | 21.11.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 29/19 B | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 9. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 2/18 | 01.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 9. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 7 KR 772/16 | 04.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 9. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 18 U 509/14 | 10.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 425/16 | 19.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 9. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 16 U 78/17 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 9. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 5 AS 811/16 | 16.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 9. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 KO 1845/19 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 1952/19 B | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 11 BA 1887/18 | 10.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 282/19 | 19.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 SF 605/19 E | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 909/19 E-B | 08.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 SF 2046/18 E | 25.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 4254/18 E-B | 02.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 40 SF 211/19 E | 31.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 8. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 6 AS 333/19 ER | 05.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 150/19 B ER und L 2 AS 151/19 B | 19.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 139/16 | 17.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 8 SO 36/18 | 09.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 123/14 | 22.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 3 R 175/16 | 02.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 219/18 B | 18.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 8 R 1573/13 | 21.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 1 R 162/17 | 03.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 18 AS 446/15 | 06.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 674/18 NZB | 08.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 85 R 279/18 | 27.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 195 SO 263/16 | 09.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 232/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 17 AS 2325/15 | 28.01.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 204/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Leipzig | 7. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 KR 756/18 | 02.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 7. Oktober 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 8 SO 3920/14 | 10.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 4766/17 | 25.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 474 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 474 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 474 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 365/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-365-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-365-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 704/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-704-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-704-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 4668/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-4668-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-4668-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 4349/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-4349-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-4349-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150899 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 29/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-29-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-29-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 2/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-2-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-2-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 772/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-772-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-772-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 509/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-509-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-509-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 U 78/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-u-78-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-u-78-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 811/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-811-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-811-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 1952/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-1952-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:57:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:57:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-1952-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 282/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-282-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:56:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:56:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-282-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 909/19 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-909-19-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:55:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:55:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-909-19-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 152838 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 4254/18 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-4254-18-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:55:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:55:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-4254-18-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 SF 211/19 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-sf-211-19-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-sf-211-19-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 150/19 B ER und L 2 AS 151/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-150-19-b-er-und-l-2-as-151-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-150-19-b-er-und-l-2-as-151-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 36/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-36-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-36-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 175/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-175-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-175-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 162/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-162-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-162-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 674/18 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-674-18-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-674-18-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 85 R 279/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-85-r-279-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-85-r-279-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149963 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 195 SO 263/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-195-so-263-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-195-so-263-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AS 2325/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-as-2325-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-as-2325-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 756/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-756-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-756-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153274 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 4766/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-4766-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-4766-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 U 365/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-u-365-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-u-365-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 58528ae55d58cd0f5e166712d56dffb8 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:79f51550d7e2ab30bbca16e7368ecba1:0.11331700 1758676323 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.