| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 KA 5438/14 | 11.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 2448/15 | 26.04.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 34/17 R | 24.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 2 KA 5414/10 | 12.03.2014 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 11 KA 690/14 | 25.08.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 42/17 R | 24.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Oktober 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SB 877/19 | 29.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2685/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 2. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 KR 346/14 | 08.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 186/17 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 P 184/16 | 03.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 87/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 P 184/16 | 03.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 87/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 31 AS 427/13 | 14.03.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1331/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 R 1032/14 | 23.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 38/18 | 13.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Köln | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 12 U 181/12 | 08.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 94/16 | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 18 U 120/10 | 27.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 78/16 | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 1. Oktober 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 1753/17 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3983/18 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 R 1161/16 | 09.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 4542/16 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 3635/16 | 08.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3982/18 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 607/13 | 02.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2298/16 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 1352/16 | 15.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 2189/18 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 U 107/18 | 05.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 712/19 | 24.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 162/17 | 11.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 511/19 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 620/16 | 09.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 501/19 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 25 R 3985/16 | 05.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 344/18 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 R 3414/17 | 14.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 118/19 | 19.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 118 VE 70/19 RH | 26.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 30. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 13/16 | 20.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 167/18 | 14.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 BA 50/18 | 12.09.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 30. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 30 U 13/16 | 20.06.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 167/18 | 14.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 30. September 2019 | |
| - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 99/19 | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 475 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 475 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 475 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 34/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-34-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-34-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 42/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-42-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-42-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 SB 877/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-sb-877-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-sb-877-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 186/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-186-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-186-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134473 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 184/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-184-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-184-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134472 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 P 184/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-p-184-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-p-184-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134468 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 427/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-427-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-427-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 1032/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-1032-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-1032-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 94/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-94-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-94-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 78/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-78-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:16:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:16:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-78-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3983/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3983-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3983-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 4542/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-4542-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-4542-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153262 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3982/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3982-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3982-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2298/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2298-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2298-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153255 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 2189/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-2189-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-2189-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 712/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-712-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-712-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 511/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-511-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:00:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:00:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-511-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 501/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-501-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-501-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 344/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-344-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-344-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 118/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-118-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-118-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149959 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 118 VE 70/19 RH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-118-ve-70-19-rh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-118-ve-70-19-rh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 U 13/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-u-13-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-u-13-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 BA 50/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-ba-50-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-ba-50-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 167/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-167-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-167-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 99/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-99-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-99-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87162 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 34/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-34-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-34-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b5615fe543e193b828dac753f4b8c10c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8522d34ca38783b80421c014d3e221cd:0.40829800 1758681884 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.