Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 691/19 | 26.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |||
- | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 696/19 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |||
S 16 KA 72/16 (SG Kiel) | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 43/17 Beglaubigte Abschrift | 09.11.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 28/19 R | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 70/17 | 07.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 27. September 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 46 EG 25/17 BG | 04.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 20/18 BG | 01.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 46 AS 489/14 | 29.09.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 627/17 | 11.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 53 AS 714/19 ER | 05.06.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 450/19 B ER | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 29 SF 6/17 E | 15.01.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 333/18 B | 01.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 51 KR 141/19 ER (SG Lübeck) | 19.07.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 120/19 B ER | 04.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 25 R 340/16 | 25.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 494/17 | 18.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 318/16 | 31.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 151/17 | 05.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 17/18 R | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 R 186/12 | 15.03.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 105/16 | 12.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 220/17 B | 15.08.2019 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 R 186/12 | 15.03.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 105/16 | 12.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 220/17 B | 15.08.2019 | Sozialgericht Fulda | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 21 KR 613/16 | 20.10.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 50/18 | 18.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 5 AS 702/14 | 28.01.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 208/16 | 21.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 AS 285/17 | 25.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 454/18 | 19.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 8 R 866/16 | 08.05.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 376/17 | 08.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Fulda | S 1 R 186/12 | 15.03.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 105/16 | 12.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 220/17 B | 15.08.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 37 AS 661/14 | 04.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 1503/15 | 11.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 13/18 R | 08.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 20 KR 173/08 | 03.09.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 333/13 | 07.12.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 6/17 R | 20.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 3 R 162/16 | 25.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 6 R 223/17 | 12.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RE 3/18 R | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 12 VE 8/16 | 24.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 VE 1/18 | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 25. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 20 R 160/14 | 24.11.2014 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 3 R 1/17 | 25.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 25. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 SO 1981/14 | 10.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1686/17 | 25.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 46 KR 426/13 | 01.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Hamburg | 25. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 476 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 476 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 476 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 691/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-691-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-691-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 696/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-696-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-696-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 43/17 Beglaubigte Abschrift [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-43-17-beglaubigte-abschrift [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-43-17-beglaubigte-abschrift/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 70/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-70-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-70-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 20/18 BG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-20-18-bg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-20-18-bg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 627/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-627-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-627-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 450/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-450-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-450-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150890 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 333/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-333-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-333-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 120/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-120-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-120-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 340/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-340-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-340-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 318/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-318-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:53:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:53:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-318-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 186/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-186-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-186-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 186/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-186-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-186-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 KR 50/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-kr-50-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-kr-50-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 208/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-208-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-208-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 454/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-454-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-454-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 376/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-376-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-376-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 105/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-105-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-105-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87205 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 6/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-6-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-6-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 RE 3/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-re-3-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-re-3-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 VE 1/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ve-1-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:00:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:00:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ve-1-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 1/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-1-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-1-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1686/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1686-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1686-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 KR 426/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-kr-426-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-kr-426-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150895 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 691/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-691-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-691-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e02cd637d83537ecc389ee6a07b599ec [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e85523c7dccf42e3f000894ceb62a010:0.88417700 1758681869 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.