| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 29 SO 22/19 ER | 27.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 145/19 B | 30.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 25. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 39/15 | 02.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 24. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 11/15 | 02.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 24. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 77/15 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 222/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 24. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 KR 77/15 | 14.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 222/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 24. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 1 R 219/17 | 20.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Heilbronn | 24. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 101 AS 7940/19 ER | 02.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 1627/19 B ER | 16.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 AS 1333/19 ER | 08.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 857/19 B ER | 11.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 24 AL 257/16 ER | 04.08.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 201/16 B | 04.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 148/19 ER | 09.05.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 70/19 B ER | 27.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 261/14 | 07.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 43/17 | 27.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 36 U 232/17 | 18.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 12/19 | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 14 AL 467/16 | 19.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 AL 50/18 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 AS 2331/19 ER | 09.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2773/19 ER-B | 20.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 R 3418/16 | 04.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1952/18 | 17.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 11 U 62/17 | 17.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 20. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 13 R 165/13 | 12.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 495/17 | 24.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 20/18 R | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 R 5088/13 | 24.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 5059/17 | 22.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 5/19 R | 04.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 AS 1709/17 | 12.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 4118/17 | 15.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 28/18 R | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 10 R 767/13 | 17.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 2 R 319/15 | 06.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 35/17 R | 12.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 188 R 6774/13 | 31.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 2 R 712/15 | 10.03.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 27/17 R | 12.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 R 3639/15 | 23.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1071/17 | 21.06.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 19/17 R | 12.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 25 R 291/16 | 12.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 223/18 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 19. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 9 AS 916/10 | 13.12.2013 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 80/14 | 18.10.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Magdeburg | 19. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 9/18 ER | 08.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 477 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 477 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 477 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11900, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 145/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-145-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-145-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134429 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 39/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-39-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-39-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134425 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 11/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-11-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-11-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 77/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-77-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-77-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134420 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 KR 77/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-kr-77-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-kr-77-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 R 219/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-r-219-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:54:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:54:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-r-219-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 1627/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-1627-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-1627-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160067 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 857/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-857-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-857-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 201/16 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-201-16-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-201-16-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160061 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 70/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-70-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-70-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 43/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-43-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-43-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 12/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-12-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-12-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AL 50/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-al-50-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:59:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:59:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-al-50-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2773/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2773-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2773-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153222 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1952/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1952-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1952-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 U 62/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-u-62-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:58:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:58:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-u-62-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 20/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-20-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-20-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 5/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-5-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-5-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87232 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 28/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-28-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-28-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 35/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-35-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-35-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 27/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-27-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-27-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 19/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-19-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-19-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 R 291/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-r-291-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-r-291-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133182 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 AS 916/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-as-916-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-as-916-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SO 9/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-so-9-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-so-9-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 145/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-145-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-145-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 416516c40446a195c9ad8be69f3b49d3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:45b68c8711774fc62c22a470bf59aa26:0.05141600 1758700178 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.