| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 SO 4/18 ER | 05.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 19 SB 8/15 | 16.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 8 RS 10/15 | 22.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 R 889/14 | 06.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 19. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 4442/18 ER | 18.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 117/19 B ER | 25.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 19. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 64 AS 14651/16 | 14.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 324/19 | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 52 AL 1361/16 | 05.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 140/17 | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 19. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 20 U 9/13 (SG Lübeck) | 22.03.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 U 51/16 | 05.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 18. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 16 KA 189/10 | 19.02.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 18. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 16 KA 137/10 | 19.02.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 18. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 R 361/16 | 19.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | 18. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 18 KR 79/12 | 21.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 130/17 | 30.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1469/19 ER | 29.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 308/19 B ER | 04.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 41/18 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 17. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 62/16 | 13.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 715/16 | 28.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 17. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 107/10 | 24.01.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 175/17 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 17. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 1 U 34/14 | 01.07.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 145/14 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 17. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 19/16 | 04.12.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 7/18 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 17. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 78/18 | 13.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 181/18 | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 7/19 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 15 AS 627/18 | 29.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 354/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 16. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AY 38/19 ER | 06.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 16. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 14 R 162/13 | 25.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 715/17 | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 12 AL 126/12 | 30.06.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 207/15 | 03.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 4208/15 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 279/19 B PKH | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 1452/19 ER | 02.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 298/19 B ER | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 478 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 478 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 478 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SO 4/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-so-4-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-so-4-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 SB 8/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-sb-8-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-sb-8-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 RS 10/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-rs-10-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-rs-10-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 889/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-889-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-889-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 117/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-117-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-117-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 324/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-324-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-324-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 140/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-140-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-140-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 51/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-51-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-51-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KA 189/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ka-189-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ka-189-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137335 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KA 137/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-ka-137-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:44:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:44:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-ka-137-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 361/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-361-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-361-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 130/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-130-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-130-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 308/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-308-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-308-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149954 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 41/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-41-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:46:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:46:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-41-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 62/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-62-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-62-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 107/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-107-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-107-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 34/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-34-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-34-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 19/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-19-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-19-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 181/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-181-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-181-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AS 627/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-as-627-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-as-627-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AY 38/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ay-38-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ay-38-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 715/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-715-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-715-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 207/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-207-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:57:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:57:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-207-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 279/19 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-279-19-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-279-19-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 298/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-298-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-298-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 SO 4/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-so-4-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-so-4-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a3683479d47dc81542a9fa61c22163ac [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b085e71cba69523d8637284c27c1e539:0.71995300 1758688069 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.