| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 79 KA 247/11 | 29.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 18/14 | 18.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 1/18 R | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 13. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 12 KR 90/18 | 01.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 166/18 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/19 R | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 5 AL 349/02 | 10.06.2003 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 656/03 | 22.09.2004 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7a/7 AL 84/04 R | 03.05.2005 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 12. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 SB 151/18 | 14.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 14 U 104/17 | 06.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 421/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 438/19 ER | 14.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 285/19 B ER | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 702/11 | 09.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 28 KR 702/11 | 09.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 47/16 | 23.11.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 198/17 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 147/18 | 29.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 12. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 17 KR 310/10 | 15.03.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 264/13 | 29.01.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 25/15 R | 23.06.2016 | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 12. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 12 AL 5/14 | 29.10.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 291/15 | 11.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 AS 142/17 | 25.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 452/18 | 19.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 R 5088/13 | 24.11.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 5059/17 | 22.03.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 234/19 ER | 24.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 221/19 B ER | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1664/17 | 22.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 64/19 | 19.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 208 KR 1197/15 | 05.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 364/16 | 14.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 41 AL 93/13 | 24.08.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 175/16 | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 12. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 U 1700/17 | 14.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 3728/18 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 AL 870/19 | 04.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 2194/19 B | 09.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 16 AL 868/19 | 07.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 1667/19 B | 09.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 U 3778/14 | 04.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 551/18 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 998/15 | 11.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 2977/18 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 12 VU 17/16 | 03.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 11. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 1902/15 | 14.12.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 675/16 | 10.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 62/18 B | 11.07.2019 | Sozialgericht München | 11. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 479 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 479 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 479 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 18/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-18-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-18-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87271 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 11/19 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-11-19-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-11-19-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 349/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-349-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-349-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 SB 151/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-sb-151-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-sb-151-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 U 104/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-u-104-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-u-104-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 438/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-438-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-438-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 702/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-702-11-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-702-11-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 702/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-702-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-702-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 135655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 47/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-47-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:34:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:34:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-47-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 147/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-147-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-147-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KR 310/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-kr-310-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-kr-310-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 291/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-291-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-291-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129405 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 452/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-452-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:50:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:50:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-452-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128981 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 5059/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-5059-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:46:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:46:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-5059-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 221/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-221-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-221-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 64/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-64-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-64-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 364/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-364-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-364-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 175/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-175-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-175-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 3728/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-3728-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-3728-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 2194/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-2194-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-2194-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 1667/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-1667-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-1667-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 551/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-551-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-551-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 2977/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-2977-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-2977-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 VU 17/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-vu-17-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-vu-17-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142987 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 44 KR 1902/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-44-kr-1902-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-44-kr-1902-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 124357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 18/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-18-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-18-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5c574cca8c876a316499a65bdc782b72 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1b638013d251bc8e9c3d06cd5b70c8b4:0.05335100 1758700149 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.