| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 9 VE 10/18 | 15.02.2023 | L 7 VE 7/23 B | 18.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 10 SO 56/18 | 10.06.2022 | L 8 SO 36/22 | 16.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 22 AS 3357/16 | 19.08.2020 | L 4 AS 503/20 | 31.01.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 10 AS 2032/19 | 08.01.2024 | L 2 AS 30/24 NZB | 04.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 11 AS 1210/19 | 20.04.2020 | L 2 AS 29/24 NZB | 22.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 10 R 678/18 | 12.05.2022 | L 3 R 166/22 | 15.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 46 R 646/18 | 17.08.2022 | L 3 R 252/22 | 11.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 2362/22 | 03.01.2023 | L 4 KR 211/23 | 23.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 KR 275/21 | 03.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2345/22 | 23.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 3764/21 | 17.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 905/22 | 23.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 2 KR 627/23 | 30.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1823/23 | 23.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 VK 2275/17 | 19.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VK 1086/24 | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 10 VE 1809/23 | 07.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VK 798/24 | 16.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 246/22 | 09.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1468/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 VG 3401/20 | 01.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 902/23 | 29.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 112/24 ER | 18.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 476/24 B ER | 03.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 16 AS 2347/21 | 08.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1044/22 | 03.08.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 15/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. Mai 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 20 AS 1478/20 | 15.01.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 29. Mai 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 31 BA 236/21 | 23.06.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 77/22 | 05.03.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 10 BA 250/18 | 23.01.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 14/23 | 16.04.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 U 239/19 | 14.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 132/21 | 15.01.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 24 AS 38/24 ER | 06.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 6 AS 156/24 B ER | 12.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 70 R 465/18 | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 197/22 | 06.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 3 KR 1623/14 | 20.10.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 622/16 | 17.10.2023 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Mai 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 U 611/19 | 08.12.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 10/22 | 29.01.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Mai 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 48 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 48 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 48 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 1175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 VE 7/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ve-7-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ve-7-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 36/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-36-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-36-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 503/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-503-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-503-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 30/24 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-30-24-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-30-24-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 29/24 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-29-24-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-29-24-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 166/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-166-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-166-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 252/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-252-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-252-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160461 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 211/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-211-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-211-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2345/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2345-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2345-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160455 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 905/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-905-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-905-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160452 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1823/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1823-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1823-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VK 1086/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vk-1086-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vk-1086-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160446 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VK 798/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vk-798-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vk-798-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1468/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1468-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1468-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 902/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-902-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:22:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:22:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-902-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 476/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-476-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-476-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1044/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1044-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:55:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:55:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1044-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 1478/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-1478-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-1478-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 77/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-77-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-77-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 14/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-14-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-14-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 132/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-132-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-132-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 156/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-156-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-156-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 197/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-197-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:09:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:09:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-197-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 622/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-622-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-622-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 10/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-10-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:13:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:13:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-10-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 VE 7/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ve-7-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:57:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:57:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ve-7-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e58e6c9d6d1a2f0c56e3c43781550167 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fd0ea8ce0613a2eaee3011cfa2c420a7:0.30798400 1745263746 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.