| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 47 KR 1602/19 ER | 02.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 10 (12) AL 181/02 | 09.06.2004 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AL 221/04 | 01.06.2005 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 285/13 | 24.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 142/17 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 116/13 | 17.02.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 56/15 | 30.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 454/18 | 30.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 27/19 B | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 69/12 | 14.06.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 129/13 | 19.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/18 R | 29.10.2018 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 2 U 221/16 | 27.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 115/18 | 28.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 77/19 B | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 11. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 26 SO 112/18 | 11.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 120/19 B | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 17 AY 22/18 ER | 12.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 11. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 21 KR 123/16 | 14.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 56/17 | 31.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 285/13 | 24.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 142/17 | 21.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 69/12 | 14.06.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 129/13 | 19.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 11/18 R | 29.10.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 11. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 49 SO 1018/19 ER | 18.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 186/19 B ER | 19.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 20 SO 34/19 ER | 28.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 23 SO 187/19 B ER | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 16 AS 624/19 ER | 31.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 1254/19 B ER | 07.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 11. September 2019 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 2552/19 | 02.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. September 2019 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 7 R 1715/15 | 06.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 10. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 1284/19 | 26.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 238/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 10. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 1284/19 | 26.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 238/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 10. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 AL 122/00 | 25.10.2001 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AL 1318/01 | 03.09.2003 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 31/04 R | 21.07.2005 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 10. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 884/14 | 23.06.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 170/15 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 884/14 | 23.06.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 170/15 | 10.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 114/17 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 49/19 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 1196/16 | 30.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 29/19 | 07.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 9. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 AS 2318/19 ER | 18.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 2441/19 ER-B | 04.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 480 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 480 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 480 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 11975, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 KR 1602/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-kr-1602-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-kr-1602-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 (12) AL 181/02 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-12-al-181-02 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-12-al-181-02/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 285/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-285-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-285-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 116/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-116-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-116-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 454/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-454-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-454-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 69/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-69-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-69-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134449 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 U 221/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-u-221-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-u-221-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134402 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 SO 112/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-so-112-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-so-112-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AY 22/18 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ay-22-18-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ay-22-18-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131763 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 KR 123/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-kr-123-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-kr-123-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 142/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-142-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-142-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 129/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-129-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:48:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:48:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-129-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 186/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-186-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-186-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 23 SO 187/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-23-so-187-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-23-so-187-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 1254/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-1254-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-1254-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 2552/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-2552-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-2552-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 R 1715/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-r-1715-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-r-1715-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142913 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 1284/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-1284-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-1284-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 1284/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-1284-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-1284-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138715 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 122/00 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-122-00 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:04:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:04:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-122-00/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 170/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-170-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-170-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160058 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 170/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-170-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-170-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 114/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-114-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-114-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 1196/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-1196-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:56:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:56:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-1196-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 2441/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-2441-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-2441-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 KR 1602/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-kr-1602-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:35:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:35:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-kr-1602-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3543f5531153933fc95fe116c539bd19 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6639468572514fe4d068ea8b83a5b39c:0.54068700 1758700163 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.