| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 R 1114/16 | 29.11.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 812/17 | 14.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 306/15 | 12.04.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 339/18 | 30.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 10 SF 218/14 E | 04.08.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 231/15 | 19.08.2014 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 22 SO 648/18 | 18.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 19/19 B | 06.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 15 AS 78/17 | 19.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 52/19 | 16.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 6. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 13 KA 76/14 | 30.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 9 KA 1/16 | 22.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 35 KR 211/13 | 24.02.2016 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 109/18 | 13.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 15 R 30/14 | 22.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L8 KR 278/17 | 30.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 85/18 B | 12.03.2019 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 298/11 | 21.01.2014 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 133/14 | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 R 254/17 | 24.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 493/18 | 05.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 15 P 108/16 | 07.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 P 35/18 | 25.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 12 KR 428/19 ER | 11.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 284/19 B ER | 17.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 Vi 1/93 | 07.04.1995 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 VJ 12/17 | 07.09.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 25 AS 945/16 | 18.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 349/17 | 11.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 6/18 R | 08.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 SB 2207/16 | 16.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 2892/18 | 21.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 18/19 B | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 15 KR 105/14 | 29.09.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 415/15 | 24.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 13/18 R | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 5. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 137/17 | 24.05.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 24/17 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 4. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 28 SO 116/14 | 05.04.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 92/17 | 09.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 344/10 | 07.03.2012 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 180/12 | 05.12.2013 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 6/14 R | 23.10.2014 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 4. September 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 R 851/17 | 12.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 158/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 4. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 519/16 | 12.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 4. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 AY 2797/19 ER | 01.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 AY 2735/19 ER-B | 28.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 71/18 | 27.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 38/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 3. September 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 1 KR 170/16 | 25.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 3. September 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 3126/19 ER | 30.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 481 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 481 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 481 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12000, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 812/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-812-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-812-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 339/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-339-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-339-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130040 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 231/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-231-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-231-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 19/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-19-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-19-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 52/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-52-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-52-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KA 1/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ka-1-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:39:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:39:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ka-1-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 109/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-109-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-109-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 R 30/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-r-30-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-r-30-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 R 298/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-r-298-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-r-298-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 493/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-493-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-493-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 P 35/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-p-35-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-p-35-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 284/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-284-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-284-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 VJ 12/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-vj-12-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-vj-12-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87267 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 14 AS 6/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-14-as-6-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-14-as-6-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 SB 18/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-sb-18-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-sb-18-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87224 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 13/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-13-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-13-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 137/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-137-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-137-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136047 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 SO 116/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-so-116-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-so-116-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136042 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 344/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-344-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-344-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134444 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 851/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-851-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:22:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:22:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-851-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131765 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 519/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-519-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-519-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AY 2735/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ay-2735-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ay-2735-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 71/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-71-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-71-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 KR 170/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-kr-170-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:57:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:57:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-kr-170-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 AS 3126/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-as-3126-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-as-3126-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 812/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-812-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-812-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6c050af59bb9a8b2d4b7800e27db96f3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:587a5dfe0c906ced775f7929d4fb0178:0.70115800 1758705898 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.