Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 3368/19 ER | 27.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. September 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 41 AS 2408/18 | 09.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 3. September 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 23 U 394/15 | 04.04.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 167/17 | 26.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 R 954/14 | 13.05.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 5089/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 3. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 49/13 | 14.08.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 263/15 | 09.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 24/19 B | 25.05.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 3. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 26 AS 142/05 | 21.11.2005 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AS 25/06 | 10.04.2008 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 3. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 8 AS 1229/17 | 20.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | 3. September 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 R 1174/16 | 19.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 4261/18 | 26.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 U 1584/18 | 27.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3980/18 | 26.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 U 3818/15 | 04.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 3739/18 | 26.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 R 4772/17 | 07.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3645/18 | 26.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 1561/17 | 16.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2931/18 | 26.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 BA 1602/19 ER | 21.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 BA 2574/19 ER-B | 02.09.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 2278/16 | 19.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1764/18 | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 SF 5251/18 E | 27.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 1346/19 E-B | 12.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 R 958/16 | 19.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1338/18 | 13.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 R 4485/14 | 15.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 862/18 | 26.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 2942/16 | 05.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 70/18 | 27.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 41/17 | 12.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 139/17 | 28.11.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 766/15 | 03.01.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 36/17 | 20.02.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 74/18 B | 11.04.2019 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 31 R 252/14 | 11.10.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 337/16 | 01.08.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 302/17 B | 23.11.2017 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 6/16 | 07.12.2016 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 247/16 | 30.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 50/18 B | 19.07.2018 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 2. September 2019 |
Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 26 SO 112/18 | 11.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 120/19 B | 15.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 7 AL 201/15 | 08.06.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 67/17 | 19.09.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 2. September 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 104 AS 4788/19 ER | 03.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 1300/19 B ER | 26.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 482 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 482 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 482 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 AS 3368/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-as-3368-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-as-3368-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 2408/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-2408-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-2408-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142982 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 394/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-394-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-394-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 954/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-954-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:12:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:12:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-954-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SO 49/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-so-49-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-so-49-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 142/05 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-142-05 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-142-05/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 1229/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-1229-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-1229-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 4261/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-4261-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-4261-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3980/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3980-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3980-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 3739/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-3739-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-3739-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3645/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3645-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3645-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2931/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2931-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2931-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 2574/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-2574-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-2574-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1764/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1764-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1764-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 1346/19 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-1346-19-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-1346-19-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1338/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1338-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1338-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 862/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-862-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-862-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 70/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-70-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-70-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136113 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 41/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-41-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:37:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:37:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-41-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 766/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-766-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-766-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 252/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-252-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-252-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 6/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-6-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-6-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 120/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-120-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-120-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128393 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 AL 67/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-al-67-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-al-67-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125815 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 1300/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-1300-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-1300-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-09-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-09-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 AS 3368/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-as-3368-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-as-3368-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0c7f9b2726d0f12b9a23a4065f72956d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7fedf218d4e21c86f43444fe3a7ef92b:0.24407400 1758705884 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.