| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 AS 568/18 | 02.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 4347/18 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 R 3254/17 | 28.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3904/18 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 R 2154/17 | 27.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3700/18 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 R 496/16 | 27.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3688/17 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 11 R 330/17 | 18.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3219/18 | 12.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 R 657/16 | 17.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3061/17 | 12.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 SB 1677/19 ER | 29.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 2575/19 ER-B | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 4 AS 2110/14 | 18.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2376/19 | 20.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 AS 3218/18 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 1955/19 NZB | 19.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 AS 1701/18 | 07.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 460/19 | 31.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 U 2114/17 | 10.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 220/19 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 34/18 | 26.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 30. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 106/18 | 26.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 30. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 7/19 | 26.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 46/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 R 645/14 | 11.02.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 R 177/16 | 05.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 31/19 B | 24.07.2019 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 17 SB 244/16 | 12.07.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SB 123/17 | 05.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 31/19 B | 05.12.2018 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 23 R 386/18 | 27.06.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 30. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 339/19 ER | 27.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 AS 967/19 B ER | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Münster | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 14 AS 831/17 | 29.08.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 AS 697/17 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 1902/15 | 14.12.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 675/16 | 10.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 17 R 640/14 | 28.05.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 578/15 | 26.01.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 5/17 R | 12.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 16 KR 138/14 | 20.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 590/16 | 30.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 19/18 R | 01.04.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 259/17 | 26.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 2014/17 | 05.10.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 30/17 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 5 AL 664/12 | 18.08.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 211/15 | 07.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 10/18 R | 07.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 5 AL 679/13 | 13.01.2015 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 AL 80/15 | 15.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 15/18 R | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 483 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 483 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 483 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 4347/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-4347-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-4347-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3904/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3904-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3904-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153129 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3700/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3700-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3700-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3688/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3688-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3688-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3219/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3219-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3219-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153116 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3061/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3061-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3061-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 2575/19 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-2575-19-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-2575-19-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153108 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2376/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2376-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2376-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153104 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1955/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1955-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1955-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153096 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 460/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-460-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-460-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 220/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-220-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-220-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 34/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-34-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-34-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 106/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-106-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-106-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149151 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140201 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 645/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-645-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-645-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SB 244/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-sb-244-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:16:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:16:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-sb-244-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136038 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 R 386/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-r-386-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:36:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:36:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-r-386-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 339/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-339-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:08:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:08:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-339-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 AS 697/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-as-697-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-as-697-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130019 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 675/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-675-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:56:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:56:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-675-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87261 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 13 R 5/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-13-r-5-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-13-r-5-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 19/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-19-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:56:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:56:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-19-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 30/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-30-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-30-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87241 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 10/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-10-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-10-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87236 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 15/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-15-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-15-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 4347/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-4347-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-4347-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cb427f69d83b2d7e218e9080d43edc78 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:ad7e6c3473fc7f8789a190e94056a24c:0.10284300 1758715717 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.