| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 37 KR 67/13 | 03.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 15/16 | 24.07.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 17/18 R | 26.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 126/11 | 07.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 U 18/16 | 17.05.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 21/17 R | 29.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 81 KR 1980/10 | 31.05.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 213/13 | 14.12.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 11/17 R | 20.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 151/14 KL | 25.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 11/18 R | 18.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mainz | S 8 KA 174/16 | 01.02.2017 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 26/17 R | 08.08.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 2 KA 5680/14 | 13.05.2015 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 11 KA 928/15 | 25.08.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 33/17 R | 27.06.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 61 KA 233/10 | 21.11.2012 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 51/13 | 13.04.2016 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 15/17 R | 16.05.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 1440/12 | 16.05.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 121/14 | 16.12.2015 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 23/16 R | 24.01.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 KR 647/15 | 26.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 424/18 | 02.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 233/12 | 13.01.2015 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 66/15 | 02.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 29 AS 646/16 | 24.04.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 605/18 | 12.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 16 AS 4307/15 | 22.03.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 405/16 NZB | 12.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AS 5258/15 | 29.03.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 352/18 | 13.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 193/14 | 28.11.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 199/16 | 13.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 27 KR 169/13 | 21.10.2014 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 315/14 | 13.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 11 KA 116/17 | 21.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 17/18 | 13.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KA 55/19 ER | 16.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KA 5/19 B ER | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 7 SF 165/16 E | 07.05.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AS 328/18 B | 08.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 42 KR 716/19 ER | 27.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 248/19 B ER | 09.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 111 KR 1441/16 | 20.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 470/17 | 27.06.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 170 SB 4076/14 | 20.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 SB 156/18 | 13.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 98 U 775/13 | 20.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 21 U 217/16 | 13.12.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 46/19 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 29. August 2019 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 U 3237/16 | 06.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 81/18 | 16.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 413/15 | 13.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 750/16 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Aachen | 28. August 2019 | |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 SO 186/13 | 19.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 85/18 | 22.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 28. August 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 484 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 484 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 484 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 17/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-17-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-17-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 21/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-21-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-21-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 11/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-11-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:54:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:54:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-11-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 11/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-11-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:53:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:53:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-11-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 26/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-26-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:51:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:51:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-26-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 33/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-33-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:51:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:51:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-33-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87029 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 15/17 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-15-17-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:50:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:50:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-15-17-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 86983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 23/16 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-23-16-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:49:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:49:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-23-16-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 424/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-424-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-424-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 66/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-66-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-66-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 605/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-605-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-605-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 405/16 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-405-16-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-405-16-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 352/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-352-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-352-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 199/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-199-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-199-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160037 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 315/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-315-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-315-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160034 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 17/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-17-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-17-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KA 5/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ka-5-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:16:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:16:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ka-5-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 328/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-328-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-328-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 248/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-248-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-248-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 470/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-470-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-470-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SB 156/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sb-156-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sb-156-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 U 217/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-u-217-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:11:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:11:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-u-217-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 153089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 81/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-81-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 14:58:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 13:58:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-81-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144495 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 413/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-413-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:53:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:53:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-413-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 SO 186/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-so-186-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-so-186-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 17/18 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-17-18-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 00:55:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 23:55:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-17-18-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 59dc8393e170d79ce37f953131c3be05 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:11b2a3e00c4158e9908dd90d7fc88bc2:0.35842200 1758715724 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.