Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1773/15 | 14.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 99/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 28. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1949/15 | 08.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 164/19 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 28. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 3 AS 1283/18 | 20.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | 28. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 42 AY 37/19 ER | 13.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 27. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 30 SF 213/19 E | 06.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 27. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 438/19 ER | 14.05.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 285/19 B ER | 21.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 27. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 217 AL 382/16 | 11.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 8/19 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 1 R 534/15 | 14.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 215/18 | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 27. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 6 KR 1060/16 | 05.04.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 605/17 | 11.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 5444/12 | 07.11.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 44/17 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 23. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5008/17 | 24.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 23. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 52 SO 399/18 | 03.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5036/19 | 24.07.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht München | 22. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 454/18 | 30.11.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 7/19 | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 22. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 8 AS 154/19 ER | 05.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 4 AS 246/19 B ER | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 1901/15 | 13.07.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1011/18 B | 24.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 24 SF 473/15 E | 12.01.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 655/17 B | 30.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 48 R 4698/15 | 06.07.2016 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 999/16 | 09.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gotha | S 50 KR 598/13 | 26.06.2015 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 1265/15 | 21.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 1286/17 | 04.02.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 275/19 | 04.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 68/18 WA | 31.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 21. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 1/12 | 22.01.2014 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 15/14 | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 SO 56/19 ER | 04.07.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | - | Bundessozialgericht | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 21. August 2019 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 9 AY 4/18 ER | 21.02.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 7/19 B ER | 31.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 21. August 2019 | |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 543/13 | 26.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 279/16 | 01.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 16/19 B | 08.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. August 2019 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 485 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 485 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 485 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 12100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 1773/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-1773-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-1773-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 1949/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-1949-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-1949-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 1283/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-1283-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-1283-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142977 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 42 AY 37/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-42-ay-37-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-42-ay-37-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SF 213/19 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-sf-213-19-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-sf-213-19-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 285/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-285-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-285-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 8/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-8-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-8-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 215/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-215-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:15:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:15:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-215-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 605/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-605-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-605-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 44/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-44-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-44-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142972 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5008/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5008-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5008-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 52 SO 399/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-52-so-399-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:37:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:37:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-52-so-399-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 142968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5036/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5036-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5036-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:52:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:52:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 246/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-246-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:38:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:38:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-246-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1011/18 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1011-18-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1011-18-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 655/17 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-655-17-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-655-17-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 999/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-999-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-999-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 1265/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-1265-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-1265-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 275/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-275-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-275-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KA 68/18 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-ka-68-18-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:38:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:38:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-ka-68-18-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KA 1/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ka-1-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:49:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:49:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ka-1-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134833 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 SO 56/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-so-56-19-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:25:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:25:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-so-56-19-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 7/19 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-7-19-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-7-19-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 125432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 279/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-279-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:11:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:11:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-279-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2019-08-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2019-08-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 1773/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-1773-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-1773-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f9a63411b915b140bea47d4cd8733be7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:adcb236d2688982e1753d032559043a4:0.76353000 1758727482 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.